Did you mean: Printz v. United States ?
Web Results
Landmark Court Cases: Printz v. United States
Held that certain interim provisions of the Brady Act requiring state officials to execute a federal law (in doing background checks for gun ownership) are unconstitutional.
Other Cases:


Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that certain interim provisions of the Brady ...


U.S. Supreme Court. Prince v. United States, 352 U.S. 322 (1957). Prince v. United States. No. 132. Argued December 11, 1956. Decided February 25, 1957.


Lower court. United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Citation. 352 US 322 (1957). Argued. Dec 11, 1956. Decided. Feb 25, 1957. Sort: by seniority; by ...


A case in which the Court held that Congress could not require state agencies to perform federal duties under the Necessary and Proper Clause.


Case opinion for US Supreme Court PRINCE v. UNITED STATES. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.


Case opinion for US 10th Circuit UNITED STATES v. PRINCE. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.


Oct 21, 2014 ... No. 99-863. In the Supreme Court of the United States DON PRINCE, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ON PETITION FOR A ...


In Prince v. Massachusetts, the Supreme Court rejected a parent's challenge to a state statute forbidding children from soliciting for religious purposes in public ...


Facts. The Petitioners argued that the interim provisions of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (the Act), commanding state and local officers to perform  ...