Feb 1, 2016 ... TECHNOLOGIES,. Plaintiffs-Appellants v. EPIC PHARMA, LLC,. Defendant ...
Purdue Pharma L.P., The P.F. Laboratories, Inc., Purdue.
Purdue Pharma L.P. et al v. Epic Pharma, LLC. 1:13-cv-00683; Filed: 01/30/2013;
Closed: 01/29/2014; Latest Docket Entry: 05/11/2016; PACER. × ...
May 4, 2016 ... The case is Purdue Pharma LP v. Epic Pharma et al., case number 2014-1294, in
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. ... Abbott Laboratories; Amneal
Pharmaceuticals LLC; Grunenthal Group; Mylan NV; Purdue ...
Apr 7, 2016 ... Case Name: Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Epic Pharma, LLC, 811 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir.
Feb. 1, 2016) (Circuit Judges Prost, Reyna, and Stark [sitting ...
Jul 5, 2016 ... Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Epic Pharma, LLC., 811 F.3d 1345 (Fed. ..... Inc. v. Sylvia
M Burwell, et al., 2016 WL 1060199 (D.D.C. March 15, 2016)(J.
Mar 30, 2016 ... Purdue Pharma L.P., et al. v. Epic Pharma, LLC, et al. Addressing product-by-
process limitations and inherent anticipation issues, the US Court ...
Feb 29, 2016 ... Purdue Pharma L.P. et al v. Epic Pharma LLC et al. Appeal Nos. 2014-1294, -
1296, -1306, -1307, -1312, -1313, -1314 (Fed. Cir. February 1 ...
... LLC v. Apple Inc. In re: Magnum Oil Tools; Verinata Health, Inc. et al. v. ...
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc. USA; Diamond Coating Technologies, LLC v. ...
MPHJ Technology Investments, LLC; Rembrandt Vision Technologies, L.P. v. ...
L.P. v. Epic Pharma, LLC; The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New
Feb 1, 2016 ... "Despite the court's ruling, Purdue has several other patents protecting ... Purdue
licensed that technology from German pharmaceutical firm ... Stein subsequently
dismissed the lawsuits against Mylan, Amneal and Epic as well, since ... The
case is Grunenthal GmbH et al v Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, ...
The Law and Politics of Pharmaceutical Patents in India, in PERSPECTIVES ON
INNOVATION AND IPRS IN CHINA ... L.P., The P.F. Laboratories, Inc., Purdue
Pharmaceuticals L.P., and Rhodes Technologies v Epic Pharma, LLC (Fed. ...
Amicus Brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in Retractable Technologies, Inc., et al.