Web Results

rule - US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions-orders/14-1294.Opinion.1-28-2016.1.PDF

Feb 1, 2016 ... ... L.P., RHODES. TECHNOLOGIES,. Plaintiffs-Appellants v. EPIC PHARMA, LLC, ... Purdue Pharma L.P., The P.F. Laboratories, Inc., Purdue.

Fed. Circ. Won't Rehear Ruling That Axed 4 OxyContin Patents ...

www.law360.com/articles/792739/fed-circ-won-t-rehear-ruling-that-axed-4-oxycontin-patents

May 4, 2016 ... The case is Purdue Pharma LP v. Epic Pharma et al., case number 2014-1294, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. ... Abbott Laboratories · Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC · Grunenthal Group · Mylan NV · Purdue ...

Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Epic Pharma, LLC | Robins Kaplan LLP

www.robinskaplan.com/resources/newsletters/generically-speaking-hatch-waxman-bulletin/generically-speaking-spring-2016/purdue-pharma-lp-v-epic-pharma-llc

Apr 7, 2016 ... Case Name: Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Epic Pharma, LLC, 811 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 1, 2016) (Circuit Judges Prost, Reyna, and Stark [sitting ...

On Appeal, Abuse-Deterrent OxyContin Patents are Invalid | Patently ...

patentlyo.com/patent/2016/02/deterrent-oxycontin-invalid.html

Feb 1, 2016 ... Purdue Pharma v. Epic Pharma (Fed. ... the lower court's holding that Purdue Pharma's abuse deterrent OxyContin patent claims are invalid as anticipated and /or obvious over the prior art.[2] ... Xicor LLC, 692 F.3d 1261 (Fed.

Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al v. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.

search.rpxcorp.com/lit/madce-173171-purdue-pharma-v-collegium-pharmaceutical

Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al v. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. 1:15-cv-13099; Filed : 08/06/2015; Case Updated Daily; Latest Docket Entry: 09/14/2016; PACER.

ANDA Update - July 2016 | 07 | 2016 | Newsletters | Thought ...

www.mwe.com/en/thought-leadership/newsletters/2016/07/anda-update-july-2016

Jul 5, 2016 ... Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Epic Pharma, LLC., 811 F.3d 1345 (Fed. ..... Inc. v. Sylvia M Burwell, et al., 2016 WL 1060199 (D.D.C. March 15, 2016)(J.

Reformulated OxyContin Patents Invalid - Lexology

www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=12e5289e-5cdc-4af7-8010-c6e3c3a8da56

Mar 30, 2016 ... Purdue Pharma L.P., et al. v. Epic Pharma, LLC, et al. Addressing product-by- process limitations and inherent anticipation issues, the US Court ...

Federal Circuit Case Updates: McKool Smith

www.mckoolsmith.com/news-articles-202.html

... LLC v. Apple Inc. In re: Magnum Oil Tools; Verinata Health, Inc. et al. v. ... Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc. USA; Diamond Coating Technologies, LLC v. ... MPHJ Technology Investments, LLC; Rembrandt Vision Technologies, L.P. v. ... L.P. v. Epic Pharma, LLC; The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York v.

Lexis Legal News : Mealey's Patents : Lawsuit Filings, Litigation ...

www.lexislegalnews.com/mealeys-patents

A petition by Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. for inter partes review of 31 claims of a ... 21 vacated a Texas federal judge's denial of enhanced damages in a patent infringement dispute (WesternGeco LLC v. ... inventor's discovery is relevant to the obviousness inquiry (Purdue Pharma LP, et al. v. Epic Pharma LLC, et al., No.

Lexis Legal News : Mealey's Intellectual Property : Lawsuit Filings ...

www.lexislegalnews.com/mealeys-intellectual-property

Fera Pharmaceuticals LLC, et al., No. .... Court to consider whether an inventor's discovery is relevant to the obviousness inquiry (Purdue Pharma LP, et al. v.

More Info

Fed. Circ. Affirms Ruling Axing 4 Purdue OxyContin Patents - Law360

www.law360.com

Feb 1, 2016 ... The case is Purdue Pharma LP v. Epic Pharma et al., case number 2014-1294, of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal ... Epic Pharma, LLC ...

Purdue Pharma v Epic Pharma | www.krameramado.com

www.krameramado.com

Feb 29, 2016 ... Purdue Pharma L.P. et al v. Epic Pharma LLC et al. Appeal Nos. 2014-1294, - 1296, -1306, -1307, -1312, -1313, -1314 (Fed. Cir. February 1 ...

1:11-cv-08153-SHS - Robins Kaplan LLP

www.robinskaplan.com

Jan 29, 2014 ... In Purdue Pharma L.P. et al. v. Epic Pharma, LLC, Case No. 13 Civ. 683, plaintiffs again allege infringement of the three Low-ABUK Patents.