More Answers

Google 'Ripples' Don't Infringe Ripl Trademark, Court Says - Law360

www.law360.com/articles/525457/google-ripples-don-t-infringe-ripl-trademark-court-says

Apr 4, 2014 ... Google is represented by William C. Rava, Holly M. Simpkins and Timothy L. Alger of Perkins Coie LLP. The case is Ripl Corp. v. Google Inc.

RIPL v. Google - Santa Clara Law Digital Commons

digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1186&context=historical

Nov 21, 2012 ... RIPL CORP. Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC. Defendant. Cause No. ... RIPL is a Washington Corporation having a principal place of business in this.

RIPL v. Google - Santa Clara Law Digital Commons

digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1687&context=historical

Apr 3, 2014 ... AT SEATTLE. RIPL CORP., a Washington corporation,. Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation,. Defendant. No. 2:12-cv-02050-RSM.

When is a Clawback Request “Prompt”?

www.ilsteam.com/when-is-a-clawback-request-prompt-after-inadvertent-discovery-disclosure

Jan 13, 2014 ... International Litigation Services, Inc. ... In the case RIPL Corp. v. ... in the RIPL case, the court held that Google's counsel's discovery of the ...

February 2014 Ediscovery Case Summaries - The Ediscovery Blog ...

www.theediscoveryblog.com/2014/02/25/february-2014-ediscovery-case-summaries/

Feb 25, 2014 ... “Promptness” of a Clawback Request for Inadvertent Disclosure Must Be Reasonable RIPL Corp. v. Google Inc., 2013 WL 6632040 (W.D. Wash ...

Key e-discovery cases in December | Technology Law Source

www.technologylawsource.com/2014/01/articles/privacy-1/key-e-discovery-cases-in-december/

Jan 6, 2014 ... RIPL Corp. v. Google Inc., No. 12-2050 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 17, 2013). The parties entered a stipulated protective order with a clawback provision ...

Trademark Use as Keywords - The John Marshall Institutional ...

repository.jmls.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1211&context=ripl

8 See Rescuecom Corp. v. Google, Inc., 562 F.3d 123, 131 (2d Cir. 2009) ( overturning the district court's dismissal of plaintiffs keyword trademark infringement ...

Peter Kent :: Computers & Technology - Computers ... - JurisPro.com

www.jurispro.com/PeterKent

RIPL Corp. vs. Google, Inc., testifying expert for Google in this trademark- infringement case. DDR v. Hotels et al, non-infringement & invalidity reports for five ...

Protective Orders Should Take Center Stage In IP Cases

www.choate.com/uploads/1178/doc/Popeo,_Quigley_-_Law360_-_Protective_Orders_Should_Take_Center_Stage_in_IP_Cases.pdf

Apr 4, 2014 ... Inc. | 860 Broadway, 6th Floor | New York, NY 10003 | www.law360.com ... As the recent RIPL Corp. v. Google Inc. (No. 2:12-cv-02050 W.D. Wa ...

Why Are Competitor's Advertising Links Displayed When I Google ...

repository.jmls.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1102&context=ripl

during the process; the RIPL editorial board for all of their assistance; attorney John A. .... Corp. v. a2z Mobile Office Solutions, Inc., 326 F.3d 687, 695 (6th Cir.

Popular Q&A
Q: How can I sell my idea or invention to Microsoft Corp or Google I...
A: Make a trip to their office and tell them your invention. Read More »
Source: wiki.answers.com
Q: Which is Better ? Google Inc. or Microsoft Corp. ?
A: Both companies are best in its categories.Both of them are having different business process on which they are dominating it their domains. As your question is ... Read More »
Source: answers.yahoo.com
Q: How Appealing on Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.
A: How Appealing has a couple posts on today's oral argument before the Supreme Court in Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc. High Court Case Tests Power Plants' Wat... Read More »
Source: www.floridaanimallaw.com
Q: What happened in the case Fontainbleau Hotel Corp. v. Forty-five ...
A: Holding: Reversed. P had no cause of action against D and therefore the injunction against construction must be reversed. Rationale: - The maxim based on not us... Read More »
Source: www.legalgist.com
Q: Discuss the reasoning of the court in the case of Itek Corp. v. C...
A: Accepted Answer ITEK CORP. v. CHICAGO AERIAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (1968) Facts: After long negotiations, a letter of intent between P. and D. was signed which state... Read More »
Source: www.justanswer.com