Web Results

Richardson v. Perales

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richardson_v._Perales

Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 (1971), was a case heard by the United States Supreme ... Is the Social Security Act to be interpreted liberally in matters of disability determination? 9.) Are S...

Court Case Decisions - Social Security Rulings

www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/rulings/rulfind3.html

Adams v. Bowen (disability--statutory blindness provision), 90-5c. Alexander v. Richardson (duration of inability to engage in substantial gainful activity), 73-7c.

Richardson v. Belcher :: 404 U.S. 78 (1971) :: Justia U.S. Supreme ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/404/78/case.html

Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U. S. 603, 363 U. S. 611. The fact that social security benefits are financed in part by taxes on an employee's wages does not, in itself,  ...

Yancey v. Apfel - Legal Information Institute

www.law.cornell.edu/socsec/course/readings/145_f3d_106.htm

The SSA denied Yancey's application for benefits on November 9, 1989, based on its .... Yancey relies on the Supreme Court case of Richardson v. Perales, 402  ...

Richardson v. Perales - Wikisource, the free online library

en.wikisource.org/wiki/Richardson_v._Perales

Jun 27, 2011 ... ... could constitute "substantial evidence" supportive of finding nondisability under the Social Security Act. — Excerpted from Richardson v.

Constitutional Law: Due Process: Termination of Social Security ...

scholarship.law.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2157&context=mulr

Social Security Benefits: Prior Evidentiary Hearing ... hearing required by the Court in Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. ... Schwab, 410 U.S. 656 (1973); Richardson v.

93. Social Security Act Review Procedures | USAM | Department of ...

www.justice.gov/usam/civil-resource-manual-93-social-security-act-review-procedures

See Sit. v. Schweiker, 671 F.2d 19, 22 (1st Cir. 1982); Estep v. Richardson, 459 F. 2d ... In order to qualify for disability benefits under the Social Security Act, ...

Calvin v. Chater: The Right to Subpoena the Physician in SSA Cases

digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1444&context=naalj

Mar 15, 1996 ... a subpoena under SSA regulations in order to cross-examine an examining .... of Tennessee, citing both Lidy v, Sullivan and Richardson v.

the right to cross-examine physicians in social security disability cases

law-wss-01.law.fsu.edu/journals/lawreview/downloads/264/rose.pdf

In the 1971 United States Supreme Court decision Richardson v. Perales .... VI concludes that cross-examination of reporting physicians in SSA hearings is an ...

SupportGuidelines.com | Article: The Effect of Social Security

www.childsupportguidelines.com/articles/art200011.html

May 19, 2002 ... Title II of the Social Security Act provides a federal grant of old-age and ... that Social Security benefits are not property); see also Richardson v.

More Info

AR 87-1 (6) (Rescinded) - Social Security

www.ssa.gov

AR 87-1(6): Webb v. Richardson, 472 F.2d 529 (6th Cir. 1972) -- Attorneys' Fees - - Single Fee, Not to Exceed 25 Percent of Past-Due Benefits, Set by Tribunal ...

SIMS V. APFEL - Legal Information Institute - Cornell University

www.law.cornell.edu

A person whose claim for Social Security benefits is denied by an .... facts and develop the arguments both for and against granting benefits, see Richardson v.

There but for the Grace of God Go I

law.missouri.edu

firmed that the Supreme Court established, in Richardson v. Perales,18 ... lute right to cross-examine reporting physicians in a social security disability hearing?