Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 (1971), was a case heard by the United
States Supreme ... Is the Social Security Act to be interpreted liberally in matters
of disability determination? 9.) Are S...
Richardson v. .... The Bureau of Disability Insurance of the Social Security
Administration made its .... The Social Security Act has been with us since 1935.
Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U. S. 603, 363 U. S. 611. The fact that social security
benefits are financed in part by taxes on an employee's wages does not, in itself,
Dec 31, 1991 ... The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals interpreted the Supreme Court's holding in
Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 (1971) to mean that, under ...
Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 (1971), substantially altered this picture. In
Perales, the Supreme Court held that a Social Security examiner could credit ...
See Sit. v. Schweiker, 671 F.2d 19, 22 (1st Cir. 1982); Estep v. Richardson, 459 F.
2d ... In order to qualify for disability benefits under the Social Security Act, ...
SIMS V. APFEL (98-9537) 530 U.S. 103 (2000) 162 F.3d ... Petitioner then
requested that the Social Security Appeals Council review her claims. .... the facts
and develop the arguments both for and against granting benefits, see
Social Security Benefits: Prior Evidentiary Hearing ... hearing required by the
Court in Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. ... Schwab, 410 U.S. 656 (1973); Richardson
firmed that the Supreme Court established, in Richardson v. Perales,18 ... lute
right to cross-examine reporting physicians in a social security disability hearing?
Case opinion for MO Court of Appeals RICHARDSON v. ... Dawn Richardson,
Appellant pro se. .... 81 C.J.S. Social Security & Public Welfare § 398 (2004).