Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 (1971), was a case heard by the United
States Supreme ... Is the Social Security Act to be interpreted liberally in matters
of disability determination? 9.) Are S...
Adams v. Bowen (disability--statutory blindness provision), 90-5c. Alexander v.
Richardson (duration of inability to engage in substantial gainful activity), 73-7c.
Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U. S. 603, 363 U. S. 611. The fact that social security
benefits are financed in part by taxes on an employee's wages does not, in itself,
The SSA denied Yancey's application for benefits on November 9, 1989, based
on its .... Yancey relies on the Supreme Court case of Richardson v. Perales, 402
Jun 27, 2011 ... ... could constitute "substantial evidence" supportive of finding nondisability under
the Social Security Act. — Excerpted from Richardson v.
Social Security Benefits: Prior Evidentiary Hearing ... hearing required by the
Court in Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. ... Schwab, 410 U.S. 656 (1973); Richardson
See Sit. v. Schweiker, 671 F.2d 19, 22 (1st Cir. 1982); Estep v. Richardson, 459 F.
2d ... In order to qualify for disability benefits under the Social Security Act, ...
Mar 15, 1996 ... a subpoena under SSA regulations in order to cross-examine an examining .... of
Tennessee, citing both Lidy v, Sullivan and Richardson v.
In the 1971 United States Supreme Court decision Richardson v. Perales .... VI
concludes that cross-examination of reporting physicians in SSA hearings is an ...
May 19, 2002 ... Title II of the Social Security Act provides a federal grant of old-age and ... that
Social Security benefits are not property); see also Richardson v.