Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 (1971), was a case heard by the United
States Supreme ... Is the Social Security Act to be interpreted liberally in matters
of disability determination? 9.) Are S...
Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U. S. 603, 363 U. S. 611. The fact that social security
benefits are financed in part by taxes on an employee's wages does not, in itself,
Adams v. Bowen (disability--statutory blindness provision), 90-5c. Alexander v.
Richardson (duration of inability to engage in substantial gainful activity), 73-7c.
Jun 27, 2011 ... ... could constitute "substantial evidence" supportive of finding nondisability under
the Social Security Act. — Excerpted from Richardson v.
See Sit. v. Schweiker, 671 F.2d 19, 22 (1st Cir. 1982); Estep v. Richardson, 459 F.
2d ... In order to qualify for disability benefits under the Social Security Act, ...
Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 (1971), substantially altered this picture. In
Perales, the Supreme Court held that a Social Security examiner could credit ...
Social Security Benefits: Prior Evidentiary Hearing ... hearing required by the
Court in Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. ... Schwab, 410 U.S. 656 (1973); Richardson
In the administrative context, the question of whether social security claimants
have ... firmed that the Supreme Court established, in Richardson v. Perales,18 ...
In the 1971 United States Supreme Court decision Richardson v. Perales .... VI
concludes that cross-examination of reporting physicians in SSA hearings is an ...
13-11769 Richardson v. Commissioner of Social Security Friedman. 13-11844
Berg v. Commissioner of Social Security Cox. 13-11845 Donald v. Commissioner