Web Results

Richardson v. Perales

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richardson_v._Perales

Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 (1971), was a case heard by the United States Supreme ... Is the Social Security Act to be interpreted liberally in matters of disability determination? 9.) Are S...

402 US 389 - Justia US Supreme Court Center

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/402/389/case.html

Richardson v. .... The Bureau of Disability Insurance of the Social Security Administration made its .... The Social Security Act has been with us since 1935.

Richardson v. Belcher :: 404 U.S. 78 (1971) :: Justia U.S. Supreme ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/404/78/case.html

Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U. S. 603, 363 U. S. 611. The fact that social security benefits are financed in part by taxes on an employee's wages does not, in itself,  ...

AR 91-1(5): Lidy v. Sullivan , 911 F.2d 1075 - Social Security

www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/rulings/ar/05/AR91-01-ar-05.html

Dec 31, 1991 ... The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals interpreted the Supreme Court's holding in Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 (1971) to mean that, under ...

Evidentiary Issues in Administrative Hearings I. INTRODUCTION In ...

www.mass.gov/eea/docs/dep/service/compliance/adrjim1.doc

Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 (1971), substantially altered this picture. In Perales, the Supreme Court held that a Social Security examiner could credit ...

93. Social Security Act Review Procedures | USAM | Department of ...

www.justice.gov/usam/civil-resource-manual-93-social-security-act-review-procedures

See Sit. v. Schweiker, 671 F.2d 19, 22 (1st Cir. 1982); Estep v. Richardson, 459 F. 2d ... In order to qualify for disability benefits under the Social Security Act, ...

SIMS V. APFEL - Legal Information Institute - Cornell University

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/98-9537.ZO.html

SIMS V. APFEL (98-9537) 530 U.S. 103 (2000) 162 F.3d ... Petitioner then requested that the Social Security Appeals Council review her claims. .... the facts and develop the arguments both for and against granting benefits, see Richardson v.

Due Process: Termination of Social Security Benefits

scholarship.law.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2157&context=mulr

Social Security Benefits: Prior Evidentiary Hearing ... hearing required by the Court in Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. ... Schwab, 410 U.S. 656 (1973); Richardson v.

There but for the Grace of God Go I

law.missouri.edu/lawreview/files/2012/11/Dixon.pdf

firmed that the Supreme Court established, in Richardson v. Perales,18 ... lute right to cross-examine reporting physicians in a social security disability hearing?

RICHARDSON v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY | FindLaw

caselaw.findlaw.com/mo-court-of-appeals/1585555.html

Case opinion for MO Court of Appeals RICHARDSON v. ... Dawn Richardson, Appellant pro se. .... 81 C.J.S. Social Security & Public Welfare § 398 (2004).

More Info

402 US 389 - Justia US Supreme Court Center

supreme.justia.com

Richardson v. ... physicians who have examined claimant for disability insurance benefit under Social Security Act constitute "substantial evidence" supporting a ...

Court Case Decisions - Social Security Rulings

www.ssa.gov

Adams v. Bowen (disability--statutory blindness provision), 90-5c. Alexander v. Richardson (duration of inability to engage in substantial gainful activity), 73-7c.

Richardson v. Perales - Wikisource, the free online library

en.wikisource.org

Jun 27, 2011 ... ... could constitute "substantial evidence" supportive of finding nondisability under the Social Security Act. — Excerpted from Richardson v.