Web Results

Richardson v. Perales

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richardson_v._Perales

Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 (1971), was a case heard by the United States Supreme ... Is the Social Security Act to be interpreted liberally in matters of disability determination? 9.) Are S...

Richardson v. Belcher :: 404 U.S. 78 (1971) :: Justia U.S. Supreme ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/404/78/case.html

Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U. S. 603, 363 U. S. 611. The fact that social security benefits are financed in part by taxes on an employee's wages does not, in itself,  ...

Court Case Decisions - Social Security Rulings

www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/rulings/rulfind3.html

Adams v. Bowen (disability--statutory blindness provision), 90-5c. Alexander v. Richardson (duration of inability to engage in substantial gainful activity), 73-7c.

Richardson v. Perales - Wikisource, the free online library

en.wikisource.org/wiki/Richardson_v._Perales

Jun 27, 2011 ... ... could constitute "substantial evidence" supportive of finding nondisability under the Social Security Act. — Excerpted from Richardson v.

93. Social Security Act Review Procedures | USAM | Department of ...

www.justice.gov/usam/civil-resource-manual-93-social-security-act-review-procedures

See Sit. v. Schweiker, 671 F.2d 19, 22 (1st Cir. 1982); Estep v. Richardson, 459 F. 2d ... In order to qualify for disability benefits under the Social Security Act, ...

Evidentiary Issues in Administrative Hearings I. INTRODUCTION In ...

www.mass.gov/eea/docs/dep/service/compliance/adrjim1.doc

Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 (1971), substantially altered this picture. In Perales, the Supreme Court held that a Social Security examiner could credit ...

Due Process: Termination of Social Security Benefits

scholarship.law.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2157&context=mulr

Social Security Benefits: Prior Evidentiary Hearing ... hearing required by the Court in Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. ... Schwab, 410 U.S. 656 (1973); Richardson v.

The Right of Cross-Examination in Social

law.missouri.edu/lawreview/files/2012/11/Dixon.pdf

In the administrative context, the question of whether social security claimants have ... firmed that the Supreme Court established, in Richardson v. Perales,18 ...

the right to cross-examine physicians in social security disability cases

law-wss-01.law.fsu.edu/journals/lawreview/downloads/264/rose.pdf

In the 1971 United States Supreme Court decision Richardson v. Perales .... VI concludes that cross-examination of reporting physicians in SSA hearings is an ...

14-AO-015 - U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

www.mied.uscourts.gov/PDFFIles/14Ao015.pdf

13-11769 Richardson v. Commissioner of Social Security Friedman. 13-11844 Berg v. Commissioner of Social Security Cox. 13-11845 Donald v. Commissioner  ...

More Info

Richardson v. Perales :: 402 U.S. 389 (1971) :: Justia U.S. Supreme ...

supreme.justia.com

Richardson v. ... physicians who have examined claimant for disability insurance benefit under Social Security Act constitute "substantial evidence" supporting a ...

AR 91-1(5): Lidy v. Sullivan , 911 F.2d 1075 - Social Security

www.ssa.gov

Dec 31, 1991 ... The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals interpreted the Supreme Court's holding in Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 (1971) to mean that, under ...

SIMS V. APFEL - Legal Information Institute - Cornell University

www.law.cornell.edu

SIMS V. APFEL (98-9537) 530 U.S. 103 (2000) 162 F.3d ... Petitioner then requested that the Social Security Appeals Council review her claims. .... the facts and develop the arguments both for and against granting benefits, see Richardson v.