Riley v. California, 573 U.S. ___ (2014), was a landmark United States Supreme
Court case in which the Court unanimously held that the warrantless search ...
Jun 26, 2014 ... The Court's opinion is Riley v. California ... indistinguishable” from the collection
of a single telephone number permitted by the Court in Smith v.
RILEY v. SMITH, (E.D.Mich. 1983). United States District Court, E.D. Michigan,
S.D.; 570 F. Supp. 522 (E.D. Mich. 1983). Jimmie L. RILEY, Plaintiff, v.
Riley v. California. Concerning the Constitutionality of a Warrantless Cell Phone
... not protect telephone call record information because of a 1979 case Smith v.
RILEY v. CALIFORNIA ( ) No. 13–132, reversed and remanded; No. 13–212 .....
See A. Smith, Pew Research Center, Smartphone Ownership—2013 Update ...
Sep 11, 2014 ... 4 The Court also distinguished the facts of Riley from those in Smith v. Maryland,
5 one of the principal cases to apply the so-called “third-party ...
The mock oral argument will be based upon briefing excerpts from Riley v. ....
State v. Smith, 920 N.E.2d 949, 954 (Ohio. 2009). But the California Supreme
Mar 1, 2015 ... In Riley v. ... At first glance, Riley appears to be a landmark decision in favor of
individual privacy ... California, Fourth Amendment, Smith v.
Riley v. California and United States v. Wurie were cases with important
implications for the scope of the Fourth ... When petitioner David Riley was
arrested, police officers seized his cell phone and performed two separate ....
Smith (10th Cir.).
In two cases, Riley v. ... In the first article, below, Jack Call considers the Riley v.
.... phone in all cases of a lawful arrest, analogizing to the situation in Smith v.