Did you mean: Roe v. USA - 2255?
Web Results

RHODE v. UNITED STATES | FindLaw

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-11th-circuit/1445837.html

Case opinion for US 11th Circuit RHODE v. ... proceedings generally apply to § 2255 motions to vacate. Gay v. United States, 816 F.2d 614, 616 n. ... United States, 148 F.3d 1262, 1263 (11th Cir.1998) (holding that “[p]ro se pleadings are held ...

Bouyea v. United States - US Department of Justice

www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/usao-ct/legacy/2011/11/23/Bouyea-brief.pdf

Nov 23, 2011 ... Ciak v. United States,. 59 F.3d 296 (2d Cir. 1995) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 1997). In collateral proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, the district court ..... Roe v. Flores- Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 482 (2000) (quoting United. States v.

United States v. Chan - U.S. Courts

cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2015/07/09/14-55239.pdf

Jul 9, 2015 ... The panel held that United States v. Kwan, 407 ..... Roe, for the same reason. See ... under § 2254, § 2255, or coram nobis—who is seeking the.

CASTRO V. UNITED STATES

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/02-6683.ZS.html

Dec 15, 2003 ... CASTRO V. UNITED STATES (02-6683) 540 U.S. 375 (2003) ... In 1997, Castro, again pro se, filed a §2255 motion raising, inter alia, a new ...

Chaidez v. United States - Supreme Court

www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-820_j426.pdf

Feb 20, 2013 ... v. Singletary, 520 U. S. 518, 527−528. At the same time, a case does not “ announce a new rule, [when] .... §2255 or §2241. See United States v. ..... On Chaidez's view,. Strickland insisted “[f]rom its inception” that all aspects of.

No. 13-1677 Petitioner, v. Respondent. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT ...

orgs.law.harvard.edu/bsa/files/2015/09/Ames-Final-2014-Richardson-Brief-for-Respondent.pdf

Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, a federal prisoner who claims that his sentencing ..... TABLE OF CITED AUTHORITIES. Cases. Anders v. California,. 386 U.S. 738 ( 1967) . ...... Amendment jurisprudence, and the nearest case on point—Roe v.

Carranza v. United States, No. 12-334 (2d Cir. 2015) :: Justia

law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/12-334/12-334-2015-07-21.html

Jul 21, 2015 ... Petitioner seeks leave to file a successive 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion raising ... Receive free daily summaries of new U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...

BRIDGERS v. U.S. by TERRENCE W. BOYLE, District Judge ...

www.leagle.com/decision/In FDCO 20160204B54/Bridgers v. U.S.

Feb 3, 2016 ... The instant § 2255 petition was not filed until July 2015 and included ... Roe v. Flares-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470 , 477 (2000) (citing Strickland, 466 ...

218 F3d 1305 Chandler v. United States | OpenJurist

openjurist.org/218/f3d/1305/chandler-v-united-states

v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 97-6365. UNITED STATES ... Petitioner then filed a section 2255 petition challenging his conviction and sentence on several grounds. Among other ..... see also Roe v. Flores- Ortega ...

07-352 - USA v. Cockerham et al - US Government Publishing Office

www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-laed-2_07-cr-00352/USCOURTS-laed-2_07-cr-00352-2

Jan 23, 2015 ... Search field operator, United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana ... Ro, Defendant ... ORDER and REASONS denying 660 Motion to Vacate (2255) as to Enrique Ordonez Mendez (14), as stated within document.

More Info

UNITED STATES v. TAPP TT | FindLaw

caselaw.findlaw.com

Case opinion for US 5th Circuit UNITED STATES v. ... Tapp then filed a § 2255 petition, in which he argued that his counsel was ineffective in failing to timely file an ... United States v. Cervantes, 132 F.3d 1106, 1110 (5th Cir.1998). In Roe v.

Harrington v. US - US Department of Justice

www.justice.gov

Dec 14, 2011 ... 2255 Petition and Is Not Property Before this Court . ... Carter v. United States,. No. 3:07CV1477(EBB), 2010 WL 3123370 (D. Conn. ... Harrington v. Richter, ...... Roe v. Flores-. Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 482 (2000) (quoting United.

Campbell v. United States - US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Jul 19, 2012 ... to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Campbell nevertheless .... In Roe v. Flores- Ortega, 528 U.S. 470 (2000), the Supreme Court applied the.