G.L. Christian and associates v. United States is a 1963 United States Federal
Acquisition ... doctrine by the G.L. Christian company could be applied for the
benefit of a claimant, as well ... The ...
Whitney Benefits, Inc. v. United States. Citation: 20 ELR 20610. No. No. 499-83L,
18 Cl. Ct. 394/(Cl. Ct., 10/13/1989) On remand. The court holds that the Surface ...
5 Miller, supra note 1, at 1266, 1269-71 (discussing Sanders v. Village .... Courts
repeatedly state that they will address arguments not previously ..... raise the
issue.105 Some argue that the court can benefit from the parties' analysis106 ....
Inc. v. United States, 472 F.3d 1347, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2006); Cravens, supra note 1
Whitney Benefits, Inc. owned two parcels of coal land in the Tongue. River valley
... Whitney brought this action in the United States Court of Claims to force the ...
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF ... Rush treated
the claim as a renewed request for benefits and began a new .... providing
insurance fairly accounts for the application of state law, the saving clause may
Jan 11, 2016 ... ... Group (AIG) $85 billion to save the insurance giant from insolvency. <sup>1×</sup> 1. ...
United States, 372 F.2d 1002, 1007 (Ct. Cl. 1967))). .... See id. at 462; see also
American International Group, Inc. (AIG): Historical Prices, Yahoo! ..... and that
any damages calculation on appeal may account for such benefit.
They are counsel for Whitney Benefits, Inc. and Peter Kiewit Sons' Co., plaintiffs
in. Whitney Benefits ... visors v. United States, 23 Cl. Ct. 205 (1991), complaint
dismissed, 27 Fed. Cl. 339 ...... United States: I'll Let You Save Me-If You Pay Me
20,353. SAVE OUR WETLANDS, INC. (SOWL), et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ...
The federal defendants named were the United States Army Corps of ..... made
by the defendants and the environmental benefits which might result if the
Case opinion for US Supreme Court OFFSHORE LOGISTICS, INC. v. ...
Respondents each filed wrongful death suits in United States District Court,
raising claims ..... their resolve to save to suitors the benefits of state judicial, and,
Case opinion for US Supreme Court RUSH PRUDENTIAL HMO, INC. v. ... (b)
This Court rejects Rush's contention that, even though ERISA's saving clause ...
the appropriate specialty of the United States medical profession is that [the
service] is ... Rush treated the claim as a renewed request for benefits and began
a new ...