Web Results

G. L. Christian & Associates v. United States - Wikipedia, the free ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._L._Christian_&_Associates_v._United_States

G.L. Christian and associates v. US is a 1963 United States Federal Acquisition Regulation ... this doctrine by the G.L. Christian company could be applied for the benefit of a claimant, ... The Gov...

Apple, Inc. v. United States : SCOTUSblog

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/apple-inc-v-united-states/

Mar 7, 2016 ... Dec 2 2015, Brief amici curiae of The Authors Guild, Inc., et al. filed. ... Dec 23 2015, Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.

Whitney Benefits, Inc. v. United States - The Scholarly Forum ...

scholarship.law.umt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1112&context=plrlr

Whitney Benefits, Inc. owned two parcels of coal land in the Tongue. River valley ... Whitney brought this action in the United States Court of Claims to force the ...

RUSH PRUDENTIAL HMO, INC. V. MORAN

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-1021.ZO.html

Jun 20, 2002 ... ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF .... insurance fairly accounts for the application of state law, the saving clause may apply. ... “ The HMO thus assumes the financial risk of providing the benefits ...

RIVERKEEPER INC LLC LLC v. UNITED STATES ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-2nd-circuit/1468832.html

Case opinion for US 2nd Circuit RIVERKEEPER INC LLC LLC v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. Read the Court's full decision ...

ARKRAY USA, Inc. v. United States, No. 14-233 C - WIFCON.com

www.wifcon.com/cofc/14-233.pdf

Sep 9, 2014 ... In the United States Court of Federal Claims. No. 14-233C ... ARKRAY, 2014 WL 2903399, at *7 (citing Femme Comp Inc. v. United States, 83 ...

Supreme Court of the United States - Bancroft PLLC

www.bancroftpllc.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/2015-03-06-Navigate-CMS-BIO-FINAL.pdf

Petitioner, v. CMS CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, et al.,. Respondents. .... 360Training.com, Inc. v. United .... that improve efficiency and save taxpayers money, instead of being ... benefit or use of the United States Government,” then.

A Survey of Recent Takings Cases in the Court of Federal Claims ...

scholarship.law.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1685&context=lawreview

They are counsel for Whitney Benefits, Inc. and Peter Kiewit Sons' Co., plaintiffs in. Whitney Benefits ... visors v. United States, 23 Cl. Ct. 205 (1991), complaint dismissed, 27 Fed. Cl. 339 ...... United States: I'll Let You Save Me-If You Pay Me for.

Supreme Court of the United States - Center for Food Safety

www.centerforfoodsafety.org/files/cfs_bowman_amicus-brief-12-10-2012_final-version.pdf

Dec 10, 2012 ... FOOD SAFETY AND SAVE OUR SEEDS IN. SUPPORT OF PETITIONER ..... 39. United States v. Univis Lens Co. Inc.,. 316 U.S. 241 (1942) .

Covenant Medical Center, Inc. v Regency Employee Benefits, Inc.

courts.mi.gov/opinions_orders/businesscourtssearch/BusinessCourtDocuments/C17-13-10708-CKB (October 28, 2014).pdf

Defendant Regency Employee Benefits, Inc. ("Regency") has moved for .... enacting laws on the subject of employee benefits, but the United States .... But pleading in the alternative cannot save Covenant's unjust-enrichment claim from.

More Info

Starr International Co. v. United States - Harvard Law Review

harvardlawreview.org

Jan 11, 2016 ... ... Group (AIG) $85 billion to save the insurance giant from insolvency. <sup>1×</sup> 1. ... United States, 372 F.2d 1002, 1007 (Ct. Cl. 1967))). .... See id. at 462; see also American International Group, Inc. (AIG): Historical Prices, Yahoo! ..... and that any damages calculation on appeal may account for such benefit.

549 F2d 1021 Save Our Wetlands Inc v. United States Army Corps of ...

openjurist.org

20,353. SAVE OUR WETLANDS, INC. (SOWL), et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ... The federal defendants named were the United States Army Corps of ..... made by the defendants and the environmental benefits which might result if the plaintiffs ...

RUSH PRUDENTIAL HMO, INC. v. MORAN | FindLaw

caselaw.findlaw.com

Case opinion for US Supreme Court RUSH PRUDENTIAL HMO, INC. v. ... (b) This Court rejects Rush's contention that, even though ERISA's saving clause ... the appropriate specialty of the United States medical profession is that [the service] is ... Rush treated the claim as a renewed request for benefits and began a new ...