Feb 14, 2011 ... Case opinion for US 7th Circuit KARTMAN v. ... Before CUDAHY, WOOD, and
SYKES, Circuit Judges. ... of homeowners filed claims with State Farm Fire and
Casualty Company for hail damage to the roofs of their homes.
... suit against defendant-appellee State Farm Fire & Casualty Company for lost
wages benefits under an automobile ... OCGA 9-11-56 (e); Sykes v. ... Gentile v.
Miller, Stevenson &c., Inc., 257 Ga. 583 (361 SE2d 383) (1987); Prophecy Corp. v
Oct 23, 2009 ... losses including medical; fire; inland marine; automobile collision or
comprehensive protection; ... Sikes v. Zuloaga, 830 S.W.2d 752. (Tex.App.—
Austin 1992, no writ). The purpose .... Property & Casualty Ins. Co., 885 S.W.2d
239 (Tex. App.--Texarkana. 1994, writ denied); State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. v.
U.S. Supreme Court. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Tashire, 386 U.S. 523 (1967).
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Tashire. No. 391. Argued February 115, 1967.
Nov 9, 2010 ... rendered unto us the unholy Trinity: Brainard v. Trinity Universal ... State Farm
Fire and Cas. Co. v. Gandy, 925 S.W.2d 696, 714 (Tex. .... Millers Casualty Ins.
Co., 866 S.W.2d 597, 601 (Tex. 1993) ... 1993, writ denied); Sikes v.
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, and PAUL COBB,. Petitioners, vs.
JOAQUIN RUIZ .... Tackett v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Ins. Co., ... Allen O.
Apr 5, 2016 ... NATIONAL LIABILITY & FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY. 3. 2013-01281 K C.
SAMA PHYSICAL THERAPY, P.C., A/A/O DeLosANGELES v STATE FARM
MUTUAL ... SEMENTE, D.C., P.C., A/A/O ZIGON v MERCURY CASUALTY
COMPANY. 10. ... P.C., A/A/O SYKES v ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY.
In State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. .... Gullo—Haas' insurance
policy, issued by U.S. Fire, deﬁned “insured” as “[y]ou ... mortgage, and casualty
insurance on the New York house, the Hallorans' only .... The Sikes Court held
2014-C -2572 GLOBAL MARKETING SOLUTIONS, L.L.C. v. ... FRANCIS DAKIN
AND STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE ... AND NATIONAL
FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY (Parish of Livingston) .... AL. v.
GARRISON PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (Parish of
Schroeder v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.1 illustrates the typical
misapprehension as to the source of the efficient proximate cause rule. There the