Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Public_Workers_v._Mitchell

United Public Workers v. Mitchell, 330 U.S. 75 (1947), is a 4-to-3 ruling by the United States ... Full case name, United Public Workers of America (C.I.O.), et al. v. Mitchell, et al. Citations, 330 U.S. 75 (more). 67 S. Ct. 556; 91 L. Ed. 754.

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/350/247

U.S. Supreme Court. Steiner v. Mitchell, 350 U.S. 247 (1956). Steiner v. Mitchell. No. 22. Argued November 16, 1955. Decided January 30, 1956. 350 U.S. 247.

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/508/476/case.html

Pursuant to a Wisconsin statute, respondent Mitchell's sentence for ... *Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the State of Ohio et al. by Lee Fisher, ... by Robert E. Sutton; for the Wisconsin Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/97-1943.ZO.html

KAREN SUTTON and KIMBERLY HINTON, PETITIONERS v. ..... Respondent 2— 3 (advancing this argument); Post-Argument Brief for the United States et al. as ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-10th-circuit/1137098.html

Case opinion for US 10th Circuit SUTTON v. ... court's dismissal of their Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq., discrimination claims ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/508/476.html

Case opinion for US Supreme Court WISCONSIN v. ... amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the State of Ohio et al. by Lee Fisher, Attorney General of Ohio, ...

www.oyez.org/cases/1998/97-1943

Karen Sutton and Kimberly Hinton (the Suttons) are identical twins who ... the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), 42 U.S.C. Section12101 et seq., ...

www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1955/330us75

United Public Workers v. Mitchell. Opinions. Syllabus · View Case. Petitioner. United Public Workers of America (C.I.O.), et al. ... Harry B. Mitchell, et al.

aclu.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=002240

Mar 2, 2009 ... Sutton et al. v. United Air ... With him on the briefs were Tucker K. Trautman and Shawn D. Mitchell. .... V. A WIN OR LOSS FOR THE ACLU?