Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a decision by the United States Supreme
Court which held that the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable ...
Terry v. Ohio (No. 67). Argued: December 12, 1967. Decided: June 10, 1968 .....
Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206, 222 (1960). Unquestionably petitioner was
Terry v. Ohio 392 U.S. 1 (1968). This case falls into the legal category of: ... In
June 1968, the United States Supreme Court affirmed the conviction and set a ...
legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Terry v. Ohio
Terry v. Ohio. In Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889 (1968),
the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. ...
The U.S. Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio ruled that the Fourth Amendment to
the U.S. Constitution allows police officers to stop, detain and frisk individuals ...
Aug 22, 2013 ... United States 16-152 Issue: (1) Whether the government fails to satisfy .... Terry v.
Ohio: The Birth of Stop and Frisk. by DONALD SCARINCI on ...
Apr 21, 2015 ... CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR ... A routine
traffic stop is more like a brief stop under Terry v. Ohio,.
Stop and frisk has been an effective tool for police since the 1968 case Terry v.
Ohio, when the Supreme Court ruled in favor of it. The court agreed with the ...
Terry v. Tyson Farms, Inc. Petition for certiorari denied on January 24, 2011 ...
192 is ambiguous, the courts should have deferred, under Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v.
See infra Part III, discussing the reasonable suspicion requirement of Terry v.
Ohio, 392 ... constitutionality of pretextual traffic stops in United States v. Whren.'0