Web Results


United States v. Washington, 384 F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Wash. 1974), aff'd, 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975) ...


May 14, 2015 ... In the mid-1800's, the United States entered into a series of treaties with tribes in what is now the State of Washington. Those treaties contained ...


Case opinion for US 9th Circuit UNITED STATES v. STATE OF WASHINGTON. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.


Case opinion for US Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. WASHINGTON. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.


Jun 27, 2016 ... v. STATE OF WASHINGTON,. Defendant-Appellant. No. 13-35474. D.C. Nos. ... The Honorable David A. Ezra, District Judge for the U.S. District.


nized that western Washington treaty tribes have a right to take fish "in common with" non-Indians from off-reserva tion waters. The U.S. Supreme Court later ...


United States v. Washington. Media. Oral Argument - December 06, 1976; Opinion ... Citation. 431 US 181 (1977). Argued. Dec 6, 1976. Decided. May 23, 1977 ...


United States v. State of Washington, 384 F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Wash. 1974) case opinion from the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington.


Washington. United States v. Washington is the on-going federal court proceeding that enforces and implements reserved tribal treaty fishing rights with regard ...


In a supplemental proceeding to Judge Boldt's opinion in United States v. Washington (Boldt Decision), as part of the ongoing litigation over Indian fishing. ... [14] Id. at 442 (citing Winters v. United States, 207 U.S. 564, 576 (1908)).