Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Miller

United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939), was a Supreme Court case that involved a Second ... Jack Miller, et al. Citations, 307 U.S. 174 (more). 59 S. Ct. 816; ...

www.oyez.org/cases/1900-1940/307us174

United States v. Miller ... 307 US 174 (1939) ... An Arkansas federal district court charged Jack Miller and Frank Layton with violating the National Firearms Act ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/307/174

307 U.S. 174. United States v. Miller (No. 696). Argued: March 30, 1939. Decided : May 15, 1939. 26 F.Supp. 1002, reversed. Syllabus; Opinion, Mcreynolds.

www.shmoop.com/right-to-bear-arms/united-states-v-miller.html

Shmoop: United States v. Miller, US government study guide. United States v. Miller analysis by PhD and Masters students from Stanford, Harvard, Berkeley.

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/425/435

U.S. Supreme Court. United States v. Miller, 425 U.S. 435 (1976). United States v. Miller. No. 74-1179. Argued January 12, 1976. Decided April 21, 1976.

www.encyclopediaofarkansas.net/encyclopedia/entry-detail.aspx?entryID=4742

Dec 4, 2015 ... United States v. Miller et al. originated in the U.S. District Court, Western District of Arkansas, Fort Smith Division when a federal grand jury ...

jpfo.org/filegen-a-m/miller.htm

U.S. v. Miller strongly suggests that bans on military-type firearms, ammunition, ..... Frederick P. Todd, et al, American Military Equipage, 1851 - 1872; Charles ...

www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/ECM_PRO_060964.pdf

The Peculiar Story of U.S. v. Miller. 49 shotgun, so the police arrested them for violating the National Fire- arms Act (“NFA”). Surprisingly, the district court ...

www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/crt/legacy/2014/03/14/mulletbrief.pdf

Mar 14, 2014 ... UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,. Plaintiff-Appellee v. LOVINA MILLER, et al., ... ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT.