Jun 11, 2008 ... ... AMARAL et al.,. Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 et
al., ..... (F.C.C. v. Beach Communications, Inc. (1993) 508 U.S..
Jun 11, 2008 ... Francisca AMARAL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ..... the [United States
Supreme Court] has said '[t]he particular context is all important.
In an oft-cited passage from United States v. Wade, the .... Robert K. Bothwell et
al., Correlation of Eyewitness Accuracy and Confidence: Optimality. Hypothesis ...
www.leagle.com/decision/In FDCO 20091208667.xml/U.S. v. NAVAS
UNITED STATES of America, v. Jose NAVAS et al., Defendants. ... 1051 , 1056 (
9th Cir.1998); Amaral-Estrada, 2006 WL 3197181, at *10-11; United States v.
Amaral v. US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner, Case filed: ...
Pitts v. Doe et al, Case filed: 09/02/2015, Cause: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
... Plaintiff, v. Steven Wayne YEE, et al., Defendants. .... The Court finds that the
holding in United States v. Green;548 ... States v.] Amaral [488 F.2d 1148 (9th Cir.
Eyewitness identification - United States. 2. Criminals ..... experiments (Brigham
et al., 1982; Platz & Hosch, 1988) were primarily interested in ..... test developed
in United States v. ... The Amaral court rejected the testimony of the expert (social.
Date: December 16, 1983. Citation: 725 F.2d 1. Donald J. Look, Petitioner,
Appellant, v. Ronald Amaral, et al., Respondents, Appellees Date: January 10,
Richard S. Schmechel et al., Beyond the Ken? .... Daniels, 64 F.3d 311, 315 (7th
Cir. 1995) (quoting United. States v. Larkin, 978 F.2d 964, ...... Amaral, a case.
on the Frye test. enunciated by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1923, expert testimony
is ... (United States v. Amara'l ... to obtain data directly comparable with those
provided by Kassin et al.'s ..... States v. Amaral, 488 F.2d 1148 (9th Cir., 1973).