Web Results

Tennessee v. Garner


Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that, under the Fourth Amendment, when a law ...

Garner v. United States :: 424 U.S. 648 (1976) :: Justia U.S. Supreme ...


U.S. Supreme Court. Garner v. United States, 424 U.S. 648 (1976). Garner v. United States. No. 74-100. Argued November 4, 1975. Decided March 23, 1976.

Tennessee v. Garner :: 471 U.S. 1 (1985) :: Justia U.S. Supreme ...


Under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, a police officer may use deadly force to prevent the escape of a fleeing suspect only if the officer has a ...



Case opinion for US Supreme Court TENNESSEE v. GARNER. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

Tennessee v. Garner | Oyez


The court also felt that Garner had assumed the risk of being shot by recklessly attempting to escape. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed, ...



Case opinion for US Supreme Court GARNER v. UNITED STATES. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

Tennessee v. Garner | Casebriefs


View this case and other resources at: Citation. 471 U.S. 1105 S. Ct. 1694, 85 L. Ed. 2d 1,1985 U.S. Brief Fact Summary. The officers in question.

United States v. Garner


Jan 8, 2013 ... UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Michael A. GARNER, Specialist. U.S. Army ... 20080401. United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.

Tennessee v. Garner | Cop Block


Aug 17, 2012 ... This leads me to our legal discussion of the day on Tennesee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985). I'll be quoting the most relevant portions, but please ...

The Influence of the Garner Decision on Police Use of Deadly Force


In March of 1985, the United States Supreme Court, in Tennessee v. Garner,5 held that laws authorizing police use of deadly force to ap- prehend fleeing ...

Popular Q&A
Q: What is Allen v. United States?
A: An instruction given by the court to a jury which is experiencing difficulty reaching a verdict in a criminal case, in an attempt to encourage such jury to make... Read More »
Source: www.answers.com
Q: What was the conclusion of Katz v. United States?
A: The majority ruled that the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. They ruled that Mr. Katz had a "reasonable expectation of privacy" inside the enclosed... Read More »
Source: wiki.answers.com
Q: Who was the judge in the Katz v United States case?
A: Burton. Marks and Harvey A. Schneider argued for the petitioner (Katz) And John S. Martin, Jr. argued for the respondent (United States) Read More »
Source: wiki.answers.com
Q: When was Korematsu v United states?
A: Korematsu vs. United States took place in 1944. ! Read More »
Source: www.chacha.com
Q: What was Korematsu v the United States?
A: Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066, which... Read More »
Source: www.chacha.com