Web Results


The case is Universal Grading Service et al. v. eBay Inc. et al., case number 08- cv-03557, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.


UNIVERSAL GRADING SERVICE V. EBAY, INC., No. 12-15294 (9th Cir. 2014) case opinion from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.


Name of Case in Proper Legal Citation Format Universal Grading Service v. ... LEXIS 49841 (2009) Who is/are the plaintiff(s) (i.e. consumer, company, employee ...


having a government grading service in place, the market for rare coins has ..... Dollar Grading Service, Twenty-first Century Grading Service, Universal. Grading ... 4See, for example, ASA Accugrade v. American Numismatic Association, et al., .... rarity.The company claims that it grades. 7 percent of allcoins listed on. eBay.


LiveUniverse, Inc. ("LiveUniverse") appeals the district court's dismissal pursuant to ... Kendall v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., 518 F.3d 1042, 1046 (9th Cir. 2008). .... Appx. 554 (9th Cir.2008); Universal Grading Service v. eBay, Inc., et al., Case No.


Jan 20, 2016 ... Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., et al. v. NuVasive, Inc., No. ... Claim Construction: Universal Lighting Technologies, Inc., v. Lighting Ballast ...


Mar 5, 2004 ... Shea, Dan Vincent, David Reiley, Larry Ausubel, Peter Cramton, V. ... loopholes in the eBay rating system, namely universal rating and ... authentic cards (as validated by the professional grading service), .... To our best knowledge, the only exception is Resnick et al (2003) where .... Forrester Research, Inc.


order in the matter of Sears Holdings Management Corp. (“Sears”) ...... 47 Kunz et al., supra note 46, lists a number of cases demonstrating this. In addition: see ...


Dec 31, 2004 ... loopholes in the eBay rating system, namely universal rating and .... To the best of our knowledge, the only exception is Resnick et al .... The casing indicates the grading service, grade received and a bar code .... company of that player. 7 ... more experienced than buyers of ungraded cards (221.70 vs.