Did you mean: WATKINS v. US?
Web Results

Watkins v. United States - Wikipedia


Watkins v. United States, 354 U.S. 178 (1957), is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that held that the power of the United States Congress is ...

Watkins v. United States | Oyez


In 1954, John Watkins, a labor organizer, was called upon to testify in hearings conducted by the House Committee on Un-American Activities. Watkins agreed ...

Sergeant Perry Watkins, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States Army, et ...


Sergeant Perry Watkins, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States Army, et al., Defendants-appellees, 875 F.2d 699 (9th Cir. 1989) case opinion from the U.S. Court of ...

Kent v. United States | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute


Kent v. United States (No. 104). Argued: January 19, 1966. Decided: March 21, 1966. ___ ..... This is what the Court of Appeals itself held in Watkins. There is no  ...

Watkins - United States Court of Appeals


Dec 17, 2015 ... In her supplemental brief, Watkins seeks to base her collateral attack on the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Johnson v. United States, 135 S.

Bills WR Sammy Watkins says he'll play Thursday vs ... - USA Today


Sep 12, 2016 ... Buffalo Bills wide receiver Sammy Watkins said Monday he will play Thursday against the Jets, despite a New York Daily News report he could ...



United States Supreme Court. TORCASO v. WATKINS, (1961). No. 373. Argued: April 24, 1961 Decided: June 19, 1961. Appellant was appointed by the ...

SCHS - History of the Court - Oral Decisions - Warren Court


354 U.S. 178 (1957) Watkins v. United States text of opinion. 354 U.S. 298 (1957) Yates v. United States text of opinion. 358 U.S. 1 (1958) Cooper v. Aaron

Week 17: Sammy Watkins vs. Darrelle Revis highlights - NFL Videos


The New York Jets fell to the Buffalo Bills in their Week 17 matchup, where Sammy Watkins contributed 136 yards, many of which came against New York Jets ...

Watkins and Blandford Decisions to Have Significant Impact on ...


USA May 17 2016 ... two opinions that will have a significant impact on Ohio asbestos litigation: (1) Watkins v. ... 102538, 2016-Ohio-2830; and (2) Blandford v .