Did you mean: WATKINS v. US?
Web Results

Watkins v. United States

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watkins_v._United_States

Watkins v. United States, 354 U.S. 178 (1957), is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that held that the power of the United States Congress is ...

Watkins v. United States | Oyez

www.oyez.org/cases/1956/261

Did the activities of the Un-American Activities Committee constitute an unconstitutional exercise of congressional power?

Watkins v. United States | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0354_0178_ZS.html

354 U.S. 178. Watkins v. United States (No. 261). Argued: March 7, 1957. Decided: June 17, 1957. 98 U.S.App.D.C.190, 233 F.2d 681, reversed and remanded.

Watkins V. United States (1957) | Nolo's Free Dictionary of Law ...

www.nolo.com/dictionary/watkins-v.-united-states-(1957)-term.html

Watkins V. United States (1957): The U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that by finding the defendant in contempt for refusing to testify against  ...

Watkins v. United States (1957) - Infoplease

www.infoplease.com/us/supreme-court/cases/ar42.html

John Watkins was convicted for refusing to answer questions of the House Un- American Activities Committee (HUAC) about people he believed were no longer  ...

Watkins v. United States - Significance, Supreme Court Rules That ...

law.jrank.org/pages/12788/Watkins-v-United-States.html

Watkins v. United States - Significance, Supreme Court Rules That Congressional Power Of Investigation Is Not Unlimited, Further Readings ...

Watkins v. United States Army, 875 F.2d 699

www.apa.org/about/offices/ogc/amicus/watkins.aspx

In 1982, pursuant to Army Regulations requiring the discharge of lesbians and gay men and barring them from re-enlisting, Sergeant Watkins — who had never  ...

Barenblatt v. United States :: 360 U.S. 109 (1959) :: Justia U.S. ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/360/109/case.html

Watkins v. United States, 354 U. S. 178, distinguished. Pp. 360 U. S. 116-123. (a) Rule XI has a "persuasive gloss of legislative history" which shows beyond ...

Sergeant Perry Watkins, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States Army, et ...

law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/875/699/179345/

Sergeant Perry Watkins, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States Army, et al., Defendants-appellees, 875 F.2d 699 (9th Cir. 1989) case opinion from the U.S. Court of ...

Watkins v. Sowders :: 449 U.S. 341 (1981) :: Justia U.S. Supreme ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/449/341/

Watkins v. Sowders, 449 U.S. 341 (1980). Watkins v. Sowders. No. 79-5949. Argued November 10, 1980. Decided January 13, 1981 *. 449 U.S. 341. Syllabus .

Popular Q&A
Q: What is Watkins versus the US?
A: John Watkins was convicted for refusing to answer questions of the House Un-American Ac... Read More »
Source: www.chacha.com
Q: What was Watkins v. United States.
A: John Watkins was convicted for refusing to answer questions of the House Read More »
Source: www.chacha.com
Q: What is the Watkins v. United States case about?
A: Watkins v. United States, 354 U.S. 178 (1957), was brought forward after John Watkins was convicted under 2 U.S.C. § 192, for failing to answer questions while ... Read More »
Source: answers.yahoo.com
Q: What side did the Supreme Court rule in favor of and why for the ...
A: Watkins v. United States, 354 US 178 (1957) The Court favored Watkins, determining that Congress was not unlimited and was not given authority to inquire into p... Read More »
Source: wiki.answers.com
Q: What side did the Supreme Court rule in favor of and why for the ...
A: The Court favoured Watkins, determining that Congress was not unlimited and was not given authority to inquire into private and personal affairs. In the case co... Read More »
Source: wiki.answers.com