Dec 12, 2014 ... The case is Wi-LAN USA et al. v. Apple Inc., case number 3:13-cv-00798, in the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California.
Jan 13, 2016 ... Last week the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a
decision in Wi-LAN, Inc. v. Apple, Inc. The dispute dates back to ...
Aug 31, 2016 ... et al., Case No. 6:13-cv-252 (E.D. Tex.); Wi-LAN. Inc. v. Apple Inc., Case No. 6:12
-cv-920 ( ... Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., et al., Case No. 6:10-cv-.
Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Canon, Inc. et al. ...
Wi-LAN USA, Inc., Case No. 1:14-CV-21854-DMM (S.D. Fla. 2015). The firm won
dismissal of all of Ericsson's claims against Wi-LAN on summary judgment. ... The
three-patent case was ultimately resolved favorably for Apple as part of a ...
WI-LAN Inc.; Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc., et al. v. Wi-LAN Inc.; Wi
-LAN v. HTC Corp. et al.; and Wi-LAN v. Apple Inc., et al. Ericsson. Mr. Burke ...
Apple Inc., et al. ... Represented BTG International Inc. in a suit filed against
Samsung et al., a suit filed ... Wi-LAN Inc. Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. v. ... Buffalo
Technology (USA), Inc., was a member of the team that filed an amicus brief on ...
Wi-LAN USA, Inc. et al., Case No. 14-cv-21854 (S.D. Fla.) (patent litigation) (case
resolved favorably) see recent successes; Apple Inc. et al. v. Motorola, Inc. et ...
Apple Inc., et al., Case No. .... Murata Machinery USA v. ..... Wi-LAN argued that
Apple's iPhones were covered by the patents because the claimed “intermediary
a multi-patent offensive matter for a mid-sized software company resulting in an ...
Apple Computer, Inc. Represented Apple Computer, both in federal district court
and ... Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc. Represented plaintiff in patent infringement matter
relating to ... Wi-LAN v. Acer, Inc., et al.; Wi-LAN v. Westell Technologies, Inc., et
... Inc. v. Inguran, LLC; U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, ... et al. v.
Apple, Inc.; U.S. District Court, Northern ... Wi-Lan USA, Inc., et al. v. Toshiba ...