Web Results

13-354 Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (06/30 ... - Supreme Court

www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/13-354_olp1.pdf

Jun 30, 2014 ... v. Burwell, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al., on certiorari ..... 13– 354 v. HOBBY LOBBY STORES, INC., ET AL. ON WRIT OF ...

Supreme Court of the United States - Senator Bernie Sanders

www.sanders.senate.gov/download/hobby-lobby-conestoga-amicus-brief?inline=file

... AND WYDEN AS AMICI. CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF HOBBY LOBBY .... You Vang Yang v. Sturner, .... et al., Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. Sebelius,. 723 F.3d ...

The Post-Hobby Lobby Tension Between the Religious Freedom ...

www.natlawreview.com/article/exemptions-court-sanctioned-discrimination-post-hobby-lobby-tension-between-religiou

Mar 31, 2015 ... Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., an all male Supreme Court majority held that closely held corporations controlled by .... In International Union, et. al v.

Holt v. Hobbs : SCOTUSblog

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/holt-v-hobbs/

May 29 2014, Brief amici curiae of Prison Fellowship Ministries, et al. filed. May 29 ... For petitioner: Douglas Laycock, Charlottesville, Va.; and Anthony A. Yang,  ...

Oneok Inc. v. Learjet, Inc. : SCOTUSblog

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/oneok-inc-v-learjet-inc/

Oct 25 2013, Brief of respondents Learjet, Inc., et al. in opposition filed. ... For petitioners: Neal K. Katyal, Washington, D. C.; and Anthony A. Yang, Assistant to  ...

We - University of Utah E Publications

epubs.utah.edu/index.php/ulr/article/viewFile/1113/815

3 See, e.g., Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. Sebelius, 133 S. ..... (Donald P. Irish et al. , eds., 1993) (“[For Hmong, being subjected to an autopsy] is considered one of ...

Nation's Highest Court Weighs Correctional Security and Religious ...

www.aca.org/aca_prod_imis/Docs/Corrections Today/2015 Articles/March 2015/Shultz.pdf

Holt v. Hobbs, with important implications for corrections. At question in the case was whether or not the ..... with the rationale, but he pressed Yang on the legal princi- ... 1 Laycock, D. and E.C. Rassbatch et al. ... Hobby Lobby Stores Inc. 2014.

Labor & Employment LawUpdate - Pepper Hamilton

www.pepperlaw.com/resource/158/20I2

effect the Supreme Court's recent decision in Burwell v. Hobby. Lobby Stores, Inc. , et al., will have on this point. As the Guidance recognizes, certain employers ...

Yale Law Journal - Expanding Conscience, Shrinking Care: The ...

www.yalelawjournal.org/note/reproductive-care-and-the-acas-nondiscrimination-mandate

May 7, 2015 ... Hobby Lobby represents a high-water mark in a decades-long movement to ... Bridget Fahey, Julie Veroff, Meng Jia Yang, and Rachel Bayefsky for their ... Controversial conscience claims aired in the Supreme Court last term in Burwell v. ...... See Sanjay B. Saxena et al., Strategy &, Succeeding in Hospital ...

the religious right to refuse service - Albany Government Law Review

www.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/Articles/Vol07_2/7.2.379-Ahmed.pdf

Jun 10, 2014 ... ... e.g., Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 678 (2013) ... 13 See Alia Beard Rau et al., Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer vetoes ... refusing to serve pork), with Potter v. D.C., 382 F. ..... 75 See, e.g., Yang v. Sturner, 750 F.

More Info

The Hobby Lobby Case: Home

hobbylobbycase.com

The Supreme Court granted a landmark victory for religious liberty on June 30, 2014 in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. ruling that individuals do not lose ...

Holt v. Hobbs | Oyez

www.oyez.org

Holt v. Hobbs ... Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections, et al. ... Anthony A. Yang Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, for the ... Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. —that an accommodation must be based on a ...

Unexpected Side Effects of the Hobby Lobby Ruling

www.nomarket.org

Jul 7, 2014 ... Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. It included both Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corporation. ... Jenny Yang (Vice President for Policy & Advocacy, World Relief) ... According to Al Jazerra, the lawyers argued that “Hobby Lobby ... It is for the case Imad Abdullah Hassan v Barack H. Obama, et. all.