On Tuesday the court hears oral argument in Lynch v. ... Maracich v. Spears ...
Aug 6 2012, Brief of respondent Michael Eugene Spears, et al. in opposition filed.
Jan 9, 2013 ... Michael Eugene Spears and three other lawyers instituted several "group action"
lawsuits against several South Carolina car dealerships for ...
Jun 17, 2013 ... Syllabus. MARACICH ET AL. v. SPEARS ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR. THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.
EPIC Urges Extended Relief for Driver Privacy Claims: EPIC has filed a "friend of
the court" brief in McDonough v. Anoka County, a case involving the Driver's ...
Jun 17, 2013 ... In two recent cases – Maracich v. Spears and Maryland v. King – the Supreme
Court has recently assessed privacy rights in the use of ...
In contrast, Respondent Spears argues that the DPPA exception for litigation
waives the consent requirement for solicitation specifically related to litigation.
See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321. SUPREME
COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Syllabus. MARACICH et al. v. SPEARS et al.
Maracich v. Spears. We filed an amicus brief before the U.S. Supreme Court,
asking it to restrict the release of drivers license information stored by DMVs.
BRAD BENNETT, et al., PETITIONERS v. MICHAEL SPEAR et al. on writ of
certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. [ March 19,
Jun 17, 2013 ... On June 17, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Maracich v.
Spears, No. 12-25, holding that an attorney's solicitation of ...