Did you mean: Terry V Ohio?
Web Results

Terry v. Ohio

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_v._Ohio

Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable ...

Terry v. Ohio | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/392/1

392 U.S. 1. Terry v. Ohio (No. 67). Argued: December 12, 1967. Decided: June 10, 1968. ___. Syllabus; Opinion, Warren; Concurrence, Harlan; Concurrence, ...

Terry v. Ohio 392 U.S. 1 (1968) | ACLU of Ohio

www.acluohio.org/archives/cases/terry-v-ohio

Terry v. Ohio 392 U.S. 1 (1968). This case falls into the legal category of: Illegal Search and Seizure. View a copy of the original police report.

Terry v. Ohio - Legal Dictionary - The Free Dictionary

legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Terry v. Ohio

Definition of Terry v. Ohio in the Legal Dictionary - by Free online English dictionary and encyclopedia. What is Terry v. Ohio? Meaning of Terry v. Ohio as a legal ...

Terry V Ohio - Kids | Laws.com

kids.laws.com/terry-v-ohio

Terry v. Ohio: The Background. Martin McFadden was a police officer in Ohio who noticed that two individuals appeared to be acting suspiciously.

Terry v. Ohio - The Supreme Court Decision - Search, Frisk, Stop ...

law.jrank.org/pages/23990/Terry-v-Ohio-Supreme-Court-Decision.html

By an 8-1 vote, the Supreme Court upheld the validity of the stop and frisk practice. Though it was determined that Officer McFadden did not in fact have ...

Bloomberg's Stop-And-Frisk Program Is Unconstitutional

prospect.org/article/bloombergs-stop-and-frisk-program-unconstitutional

Aug 13, 2013 ... In the landmark 1968 case Terry v. Ohio, Chief Justice Earl Warren affirmed that " stop-and-frisk" searches are indeed "searches" covered by the ...

When Can the Police Stop and Frisk You on the Street? | legalzoom ...

www.legalzoom.com/articles/when-can-the-police-stop-and-frisk-you-on-the-street

Stop and frisk has been an effective tool for police since the 1968 case Terry v. Ohio, when the Supreme Court ruled in favor of it. The court agreed with the ...

TERRY v. OHIO AT THIRTY-FIVE: A REVISIONIST VIEW

www.olemiss.edu/depts/ncjrl/pdf/katzMSLJ04.pdf

In its landmark decision, Terry v. Ohio,1 thirty-five years ago, the United States Supreme Court upheld forcible detentions (stops) and searches (frisk) on less ...

Terry v. Ohio (1968) - University of Wisconsin-Platteville

www.uwplatt.edu/files/urce/O'Connor.pdf

This paper examines the 42 year old Terry v. Ohio (1968) court decision and ... The Supreme Court's landmark 1968 Terry v. Ohio “stop and frisk” decision has.

More Info

Terry v. Ohio | Oyez

www.oyez.org

A case in which the Court found that police using a "stop and frisk" procedure are within their constitutional bounds as officers of the law.

Terry v. Ohio | Casebriefs

www.casebriefs.com

Facts. The officer noticed the Petitioner talking with another individual on a street corner while repeatedly walking up and down the same street. The men would ...

Crime Library: Terry v. Ohio | Landmark Supreme Court Cases ...

www.crimemuseum.org

In Terry v. Ohio (1968), the Supreme Court ruled that 'stop and frisk' does not violate the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and.