Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark decision by the United States
Supreme Court which held that the Fourth Amendment prohibition on ...
392 U.S. 1. Terry v. Ohio (No. 67). Argued: December 12, 1967. Decided: June
10, 1968. ___. Syllabus; Opinion, Warren; Concurrence, Harlan; Concurrence, ...
A case in which the Court found that police using a "stop and frisk" procedure are
within their constitutional bounds as officers of the law.
Later known as the “stop and frisk” case, Terry v. Ohio represents a clash
between Fourth Amendment protection from intrusive, harassing conduct by
Terry v. Ohio. Share. Search. Table of Contents. Criminal Procedure keyed to
Weinreb. Due Process of Law. Palko v. Connecticut 302 U.S. 319, 58 S. Ct. 149, ...
legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Terry v. Ohio
Terry v. Ohio. In Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889 (1968),
the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. ...
Terry v. Ohio - Significance, The Supreme Court Decision, Stop And Frisk
Searches ... Terry v. Ohio expanded the right of police officers to "stop and frisk" ...
Terry v. Ohio: The Background. Martin McFadden was a police officer in Ohio
who noticed that two individuals appeared to be acting suspiciously.
Terry v. Ohio was a 1968 landmark United States Supreme Court case. The case
dealt with the 'stop and frisk' practice of police officers, and whether or not it ...
In its landmark decision, Terry v. Ohio,1 thirty-five years ago, the United States
Supreme Court upheld forcible detentions (stops) and searches (frisk) on less ...