Did you mean: Terry V Ohio ?
Web Results


Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable ...


392 U.S. 1. Terry v. Ohio (No. 67). Argued: December 12, 1967. Decided: June 10, 1968. ___. Syllabus; Opinion, Warren; Concurrence, Harlan; Concurrence, ...


A case in which the Court found that police using a "stop and frisk" procedure are within their constitutional bounds as officers of the law.


Facts. The officer noticed the Petitioner talking with another individual on a street corner while repeatedly walking up and down the same street. The men would ...


Citation. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1345, 44 Ohio Op. 2d 383 (U.S. June 10, 1968) Brief Fact Summary.


Later known as the “stop and frisk” case, Terry v. Ohio represents a clash between Fourth Amendment protection from intrusive, harassing conduct by police ...


Terry v. Ohio 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1968, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). A police officer witnessed three men pacing in front of a jewelry store and suspected that a ...


Terry v. Ohio: U.S. Supreme Court decision, issued on June 10, 1968, which held that police encounters known as stop-and-frisks, in which members of the ...


Terry v. Ohio: The Background. Martin McFadden was a police officer in Ohio who noticed that two individuals appeared to be acting suspiciously.