Web Results


Feb 20, 2014 ... At $19 billion (including RSUs), Facebook paid a price of $42 per user for ... Going by this, the price for WhatsApp doesn't appear to be too expensive. ... If WhatsApp was to earn thrice as much revenues as it is currently ...


Feb 19, 2015 ... So when Facebook announced it would pay $19 billion to acquire ... Sure there's stickers, but there's too much competition to charge much upfront for an app ... not buying WhatsApp was what would happen if a competitor did.


Oct 28, 2014 ... According to the documents, WhatsApp reported just over $10 million in revenue in 2013, and a total net loss of $138 million for the year.


Feb 19, 2014 ... Why would Facebook pay such a vast sum for something it does not need, ... Why Facebook Had No Choice But To Pay $19 Billion For WhatsApp ... audio and video — does pretty much the same kinds of things that you can ...


No. It did not. The question that WOULD have bothered Mark Zuckerberg in the long run, had he (In Google style) FAILED to close the deal, would ...


they paid for user base (400 million at the time if I am not mistaken) and plus the fact that their ... However I also do think that Mark paid too much. But, anyways, a  ...


The deal was agreed to in principal on February 19, 2014 for $4.59 billion, 178 ... On one hand, it is a very real statement that Facebook paid more in value for the WhatApp ... Did Facebook pay too much for WhatsApp? Why or ...


Feb 19, 2014 ... Facebook just spent $16 billion to acquire WhatsApp, spending $4 billion in cash and $12 ... If you live in North America, you may not have much experience with WhatsApp. ... Viber, Kik, ChatON and others are all players, too.


Feb 21, 2014 ... Facebook paid too much for WhatsApp, writes Thomas Kee.


Mar 25, 2015 ... With so much cash thrown around in Silicon Valley, it's not easy for an acquisition to ... acquisition of WhatsApp last year did just that – surpassing Google's ( ... Facebook agreed to pay $19.6 billion — adding $3.6 billion to the ...