Q:

What is anti-natalist policy?

A:

Quick Answer

The objective of anti-natalist policy is to control the growth of a nation’s population by imposing limits on childbirth. Anti-natalist policies are prevalent in Asian countries, such as China and Singapore.

Know More

Full Answer

China and Singapore adopted anti-natalist policies in response to the high fertility rates during the 1960s. The governments in both nations were concerned they lacked the proper means to handle the robust growth in population. As a consequence, government leaders in China and Singapore implemented strong penalties to enforce the One Child Rule. Couples were fined heavily for having a second child, and larger families saw a discontinuation in financial support.

Learn more about Philosophy
Sources:

Related Questions

  • Q:

    Why is life so boring?

    A:

    As of 2014, researchers have yet to discover why some people feel bored with their lives. Common causal theories include the lack of external stimulation or the ability to acquire it, the difficulty of a task relative to the person, and depression.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What is the meaning of philosophy toward work?

    A:

    A philosophy toward work refers to the basic beliefs and attitudes an individual has with regard to work. Candidates in interviews are often asked to state their philosophy toward work in order to determine their work ethics and suitability for the position being interviewed for.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    Why should you invest in experiences and not things?

    A:

    Research indicates that positive experiences make people happier than material objects over time. Even though our physical purchases last longer than a one time experience, we adapt the new physical object into our lives and as it becomes normal our happiness with it wanes. The happiness we feel when remembering experiences grows over time.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    Should robots replace teachers?

    A:

    Although the social robots could be quite useful for teaching preschoolers basic skills or for teaching foreign languages, they should not replace teachers. Robots work best for these highly repetitive tasks and are cost effective. However, they cannot determine what is necessary for a student to succeed

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:

Explore