Q:

What is the difference between deontology and utilitarianism?

A:

The primary difference between deontology and utilitarianism, two competing systems of ethics, is that the former system is concerned with whether an act is intrinsically right or wrong, while the latter system believes that only the consequences of an act are important. Deontology deals with intentions and motives. Utilitarianism focuses only on results.

Advocates of utilitarianism believe that all actions must seek to produce the greatest good for the greatest number of people, according to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. This applies even if an act harms an innocent person. For example, if a surgeon has the chance to save three lives by harvesting the organs of a healthy person, utilitarian theory suggests that harming the healthy person is acceptable to save a greater number of lives.

By contrast, deontology focuses on the moral aspects of any action, not its consequences. This philosophy believes that some acts are always wrong, regardless of the consequences. Deontologists find lying to be unacceptable, for example, even when someone lies in order to bring about a desirable result.

Both of these systems have weaknesses. For instance, critics charge that utilitarianism justifies enslaving a small group of people in order to help a larger group. Critics of deontology point out that its rigidity does not allow for exceptional cases where a morally dubious action avoids causing harm to others.


Is this answer helpful?

Similar Questions

  • Q:

    What is the difference between a community and a society?

    A:

    The primary difference between a community and a society is that a community is limited to a specific geographic location, but a society can be made up of people who live in different places. Another difference is that a society is made up of direct and indirect social connections between people, but a community is made up of individuals who are more closely connected. For example, people who live in a town represent a community, whereas everyone who lives in the state the town is located in makes up a society.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What are the consequences of plagiarism?

    A:

    According to Legal Zoom, some of the consequences that can happen as a result of committing plagiarism include expulsion from college, job dismissal and getting sued for monetary damages. While plagiarism is not a crime, it is an offense that is not taken lightly when discovered.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What is the Thomas theorem of sociology?

    A:

    The Thomas theorem of sociology states "If men define situations as real, they are real in their consequences," according to the Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology Online. The objective reality of a situation doesn't matter as much as someone's perception of what someone believes is happening. Sociologist W.I. Thomas published his theorem in 1928.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What are the pros and cons of the Dream Act?

    A:

    The controversial Dream Act has numerous pros and cons. The pros include an expansion of opportunities for young people who have grown-up and studied in the U.S. but do not have a mechanism to obtain legal status. The cons include the possibility that the legislation could encourage large waves of illegal immigration and weaken the rule of law.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:

Explore