A person's attitudes and behaviors, as well as propensity for certain health conditions, are often part of the nature versus nurture debate. The roles of a person's chemical makeup and their environmental influences in forming attitudes and behaviors are debated under this argument.Know More
Other debates center on the roles of genetics and personal habits in health risks such as obesity and high blood pressure. Nature advocates argue that genetics have a high impact on obesity and high blood pressure. Nurture proponents point to the poor eating habits that cause obesity and the limited coping skills that contribute to high blood pressure.
One of the most hot-button nature versus nurture debates as of 2014 relates to homosexuality. Nature proponents believe that homosexuality is genetic or outside of a person's control. Nurture proponents believe that homosexuality is a choice or a behavior influenced by environmental factors. This heated debate has social and political implications.
A person's ability to perform in a certain occupation also leads to a nature versus nurture debate. If a child follows in a parent's footsteps in a given career, someone might suggest a natural inclination toward the craft. Others might point to the nurturing that took place in the home as the child was raised.Learn more about Psychology
How effective and helpful group therapy is depends on a number of factors (such as the nature and severity of the problem a person may be facing), but disadvantages can include personality clashes in the group, causing individuals to feel uncomfortable, or feelings of rejection from individuals when trying to relate to the therapist. In general, patients with severe conditions that hamper everyday social interaction are not suited to group therapy.Full Answer >
Voluntary behavior refers to thoughts and actions aimed at or resulting from choice in nature by individuals. The opposite behavior is called reflexive or involuntary behavior. As of 2014, the existence and nature of voluntary behavior is a matter of some debate amongst neuroscientists, psychiatrists and psychologists.Full Answer >
The structuralist perspective in the social sciences is an holistic theoretical paradigm based on the Gestalt psychology principle that human behavior and experience are essentially structural in nature, that is, that they consist of individual units that researchers can isolate and study alone in order to gain a greater understanding of the whole. The structuralist perspective has implications for a range of fields, including psychology, anthropology, linguistics and philosophy.Full Answer >
The best revenge against a sociopath may be simple avoidance, since by definition and by their nature, a sociopath has no conscience, takes pleasure in manipulating and hurting others and feels no remorse about their actions. Getting away from their web of deceit and manipulation is not only revenge, but a defense.Full Answer >