Web Results


Jones v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (1994). Annotate this Case. [No. A060386. First Dist., Div. Three. Jul 26, 1994.] FRANK N. JONES et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ... Frank N. Jones, Donna M. Jones and Snowcreek, Inc. (Jones), appeal from the judgment entered in favor of respondent Aetna Casualty and Surety ...


Pan American World Airways, Inc., Plaintiff-appellee-appellant, v. the Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. et al.,defendants-appellants, and the United States ... Jr., Jack P. Levin, New York City, of counsel; Bigham Englar Jones & Houston, New York City, on the brief as co-counsel for defendants-appellants David Linton Dann, and ...


Parties, docket activity and news coverage of federal case UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. AETNA INC. et al, case number 1:16-cv-01494, from District Of Columbia Court.


Coverage of federal case UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. AETNA INC. et al, case number 1:16-cv-01494, from District Of Columbia Court.


Jan 16, 2018 ... Doe2, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,. Plaintiffs, v. Aetna, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and Aetna Specialty Pharmacy, LLC,. Defendants. Case No. 2:17-CV-3864-JS. MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS'. MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF ...


Gruenberg v. Aetna Ins. Co. , 9 Cal.3d 566. [L.A. No. 30082. Supreme Court of California. June 11, 1973.] JEROME GRUENBERG, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents. In Bank. ( Opinion by ..... We think that the opinion of this court in Jones v. Kelly (1929) 208 Cal.


Facts. Ruby R. Calad (Plaintiff) and Juan Davila (Plaintiff) were among four HMO subscribers who sued their HMOs (Defendant) claiming the HMOs violated Texas law by denying or delaying their receipt of health benefits. Calad (Plaintiff), who was a beneficiary of a health plan offered by CIGNA HealthCare of Texas, Inc.


As we have set forth the facts of the underlying dispute in an earlier opinion, see Koppers Co., Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 98 F.3d 1440, 1444 (3d Cir.1996), we ... Although Koppers had purchased insurance from several insurance companies, all of the insurers initially denied coverage for these claims when Koppers ...


Issue: Whether the Federal Employees Health Benefits Act (FEHBA), which expressly “preempt[s] any State or local law” that would prevent enforcement of “[t ]he terms of any contract” under FEHBA that “relate to the nature, provision, or extent of coverage or benefits (including payments with respect to benefits),” preempts ...