Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rofecoxib

Merck responded by issuing a rebuttal of the Jüni et al. meta-analysis that noted that Jüni omitted several studies that showed no increased cardiovascular risk. ( Merck & Co., 2004). In 2005, advisory panels in both the U.S. and Canada encouraged the return of rofecoxib to the market, stating that rofecoxib's benefits  ...

www.law360.com/cases/56858eb34dbd067f2f0002dd

Parties, docket activity and news coverage of federal case Jean Adams v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., et al, case number 15-56997, from Appellate - 9th Circuit Court. ... Defendant-Appellee. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Represented by: Laurendeau,Amy Jean,. Goetz,Richard Blair,. Hacker,Jonathan,. Defendant- Appellee.

dockets.justia.com/docket/california/candce/3:2013cv04057/269618

Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al. Plaintiff: Gilead Sciences, Inc. Defendant: Merck & Co, Inc., Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp and Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Case Number: 3:2013cv04057. Filed: August 30, 2013. Court: California Northern District Court. Office: San Francisco Office. County: San Mateo. Presiding ...

law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/delaware/dedce/1:2014cv01131/55686/213

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al v. Merck & Co Inc., No. 1:2014cv01131 - Document 213 (D. Del. 2016) case opinion from the District of Delaware US Federal District Court.

caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1324269.html

Mar 26, 2003 ... Case opinion for CA Court of Appeal FRIEDMAN v. MERCK CO. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw. ... Jerold Daniel FRIEDMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MERCK & CO., Inc. et al., Defendants and Respondents. ...... Rptr.2d 663, disapproved on another point in Adams v. Paul (1995) 11 Cal.4th 583, ...

www.laed.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/vioxx/orders/pto54.pdf

CO INC. Tomas. Abreu. Morelli Ratner PC. ;BCBSFL. 11690-06. NJ. 11690-06 9/ 8/2006 ABREU LUIS VS MERCK & CO. INC. Luis. Abreu. Weitz & Luxemberg. ; NHP; ... NJ. 15379-06 9/28/2006 ADAMS WILLIAM L ET AL VS. MERCK. William. Adams. Weitz & Luxemberg. ;HMSA012909_Raw;TrustMark;Vista;HA;BCBSAssn  ...

www.judiciary.state.nj.us/attorneys/assets/mcl/propecia/prohacvice/prop-prohac.pdf

Oct 20, 2017 ... Yes. 03/29/17 Current. L -002249-12 Pantaleone Nick Vs Merck And. Co Inc Etal. L -002250-12 Cosentino John Vs Merck And Co. Inc Etal. L -002254-12 Hellman Brett Vs Merck Sharp &. Dohme C. L -002255-12 Grossman Andrew Vs Merck. Sharp & Dome C. Propecia Pro Hac Vice Orders & Compliance.

www.drugwatch.com/januvia/litigation

Novo Nordisk Inc., No. 6:13-cv-01516-LSC (filed Aug. 16, 2013 N.D. Ala.). Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Order Consolidating Cases for Purposes of Discovery, Scott v. Merck & Co, Inc., et al., 12cv2549-AJB (S.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2013). Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. (2015). Pending MDL Dockets by District.

www.contractormisconduct.org/misconduct

Merck & Co., Inc. $1,857,395. 9/4/2013, Puerto Rico v. Shell Oil Co., et al. (MTBE Groundwater Contamination) ChevronTexaco Corporation, Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch Shell PLC, $0. 9/4/2007, Bridge Medical Stockholder Lawsuit AmerisourceBergen, $26,900,000. 9/30/2016, China Subsidiary Bribery Investigation