Web Results

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-3rd-circuit/1255040.html

Aug 8, 2005 ... Case opinion for US 3rd Circuit ALLEN v. BARNHART. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

www.mortondisabilitylaw.com/blog/post.php?s=2004-02-05-allen-v-barnhart-357-f3d-1140-10th-cir-2004

Allen v. Barnhart, 357 F.3d 1140 (10th Cir. 2004). 05 February 2004 by Kevin Morton. An interesting decision authored by Judge Carlos F. Lucero in which the ALJ erroneously applied the grids at Step 5 without discussing VE testimony which might have been enough to deny the claim. This is another in a series of disability ...

www.gwsba.com/outlines/Administrative%20Law/Administrative%20Law%20-%20Glicksman%20-%20Fall%202010.docx

Allen v Barnhart: cautioning against harmless error because it may violate the reasons requirement. Harmless error may occur when an error is so minor or technical that it does not undermine confidence in the determination of the case. However, court should be very cautious. Should probably only apply in an exceptional ...

www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/14/14-1458.pdf

Sep 24, 2015 ... Allen v. Barnhart, 357 F.3d. 1140, 1145 (10th Cir. 2004). That sort of confidence is missing here. The administrative law judge adopted some of Dr. Madsen's opinions and rejected others. In rejecting some of Dr. Madsen's opinions, the judge explained that Dr. Madsen had examined Ms. Trujillo only twice, ...

www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/15/15-7026.pdf

Feb 23, 2016 ... Id. (quoting Allen v. Barnhart, 357 F.3d 1140, 1142 (10th Cir. 2004)). Absent a match in the listings, the ALJ must decide at step four whether the claimant's impairment prevents him from performing his past relevant work. Id. Even if so, the ALJ must determine at step five whether the claimant has the RFC to.

www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/15/15-6220.pdf

Oct 18, 2016 ... See Allen v. Barnhart, 357 F.3d 1140, 1145 (10th Cir. 2004) (finding harmless error when we can “confidently say that no reasonable administrative factfinder, following the correct analysis, could have resolved the factual matter in any other way”). 3. The ALJ also found that Shelton had moderate difficulties ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/01-131.ZO.html

Following Circuit precedent, see Allen v. Shalala, 48 F.3d 456, 458—459 (CA9 1995), the District Court in each case declined to give effect to the attorney-client fee agreement. Gisbrecht v. Apfel, No. CV—98—0437—RE (Ore., Apr. 14, 1999); Miller v. Apfel, No. CV—96—6164—AS (Ore., Mar. 30, 1999); Sandine v. Apfel, No ...

www.schnaufer.com

2005) (uscourts.gov). Allen v. Barnhart, 417 F.3d 396 (3d Cir. 2005) (FindLaw). Clay v. Barnhart, 417 F.3d 922 (8th Cir. 2005) (uscourts.gov). Grissom v. Barnhart , 416 F.3d 834 (8th Cir. 2005) (uscourts.gov). Torres v. Barnhart, 417 F.3d 276 ( 2d Cir. 2005) (FindLaw.com) (uscourts.gov). Yount v. Barnhart, 416 F.3d 1233 ( 10th ...

openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1262&context=law_lawreview

May 18, 2006 ... Gillett-Netting v. Barnhart and Unanswered. Questions About Social Security Benefits for. Posthumously Conceived Children. John Doroghazi ...... See Allen ex rel. Allen v. Callahan, 120 F.3d 86, 87 (7th Cir. 1997) (reaffirming the Seventh. Circuit's adherence to the “regular and substantial” test). 130.