Web Results

www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-azd-2_14-cv-01356/content-detail.html

ORDER: December 10, 2014, Plaintiffs shall file a memorandum, not to exceed 10pages, which attaches one or more anonymous affidavits and addresses why they show standing in this case. December 17, 2014, Defendants shall file a joint memorandum, not to exceed ten pages, addressing Plaintiffs December 10th filing ...

cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2015/04/15/13-16285.pdf

Apr 15, 2015 ... The panel affirmed in part and vacated in part the district court's permanent injunction and remanded in an action against Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio and the Maricopa County. Sheriff's Office alleging that defendants have a custom, policy and practice of racially profiling Latino drivers and passengers, and of ...

www.aclu.org/cases/ortega-melendres-et-al-v-arpaio-et-al

Sep 13, 2017 ... This is a class action lawsuit filed in 2007 in which, following a three-week trial, the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office (MCSO) was found to have engaged in racial profiling and unlawful traffic stops of Latinos. Following the trial over a pattern of unlawful practices by Sheriff Joe Arpaio and the MCSO during ...

www.justice.gov/crt/file/890346/download

May 13, 2016 ... situated; et al. Plaintiffs, and. United States of America,. Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Joseph M. Arpaio, in his official capacity as. Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona; et al. t. Defendan s. No. CV-07-2513-PHX-GMS. FINDINGS OF FACTS. - AND-. ORDER SETTING A HEARING FOR. MAY 31, 2016. This Court held ...

www.aclu.org/legal-document/ortega-melendres-et-al-v-arpaio-et-al-decision

Ortega Melendres, et al. v. Arpaio, et al. - Decision. Facebook · Twitter · Reddit · Email · Print · Download Legal Document · Bring accountability back to the Department of Justice · Add your name. Thumbnails Document Outline Attachments. Find: Previous. Next. Highlight all. Match case. Presentation Mode Open Print