Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Andersen_LLP_v._United_States

Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States, 544 U.S. 696 (2005), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously overturned accounting firm Arthur Andersen's conviction of obstruction of justice in the fraudulent activities and subsequent collapse of Enron, on the basis that the jury instructions did not ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anderson_v._Liberty_Lobby,_Inc.

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (1986), is a United States Supreme Court case articulating the standard for a trial court to grant summary judgment. Summary judgment will lie when, taking all factual inferences in the non-movant's favor, there exists no genuine issue as to a material fact such that the movant ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/417/211/case.html

Anderson v. United States. No. 73-346. Argued March 19, 1974. Decided June 3, 1974. 417 U.S. 211. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS. FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. Syllabus. For having conspired to cast fictitious votes for federal, state, and local candidates in a West Virginia primary election, ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/417/211.html

Case opinion for US Supreme Court ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-8th-circuit/1675088.html

Aug 8, 2014 ... Case opinion for US 8th Circuit ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

www.oyez.org/cases/1973/73-346

Lower court. United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Citation. 417 US 211 (1974). Argued. Mar 19, 1974. Decided. Jun 3, 1974. Advocates. Lawrence G. Wallace argued the cause for the United States. David Ginsburg for petitioners. Sort: by seniority; by ideology. << decision 1 of 1 >>. 7–2 decision majority ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-368.ZS.html

(a) This Court's traditional restraint in assessing federal criminal statutes' reach, see, e.g., United States v. Aguilar, 515 U.S. 593, 600, is particularly appropriate here, where the act underlying the conviction–“persua[sion]”–is by itself innocuous. Even “persuad[ing]” a person “with intent to … cause” that person to “ withhold” ...

www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/professional-responsibility/professional-responsibility-keyed-to-hazard/conformity/arthur-andersen-llp-v-united-states

Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States, 544 U.S. 696, 125 S. Ct. 2129, 161 L. Ed. 2d 1008, 2005 U.S. LEXIS 4348, 73 U.S.L.W. 4393, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P93, 266, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 324 (U.S. May 31, 2005). Brief Fact Summary. Arthur Andersen LLP (Defendant) was found guilty of persuading its employees to ...

www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/14-361_db8e.pdf

May 2, 2016 ... See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Syllabus. OCASIO v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF ...... heightened mental state”); Anderson v. United States, 417. U. S. 211, 223 (1974) (“the ...