caselaw.findlaw.com/us-9th-circuit/1405565.html

Case opinion for US 9th Circuit DISHMAN v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-10th-circuit/1379472.html

Case opinion for US 10th Circuit HOFER v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

www.lifeanddisabilitylaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Fleming-v.-Unum-Life-Insurance-Company-of-America-Decision.pdf

Nov 20, 2018 ... Insurance Company of America (“Unum”) and governed by the Employee ... At that point, Fleming submitted a claim for long-term disability.

law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca11/17-14722/17-14722-2018-07-10.html

Jul 10, 2018 ... Wayne Torpy v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America, No. 17-14722 (11th Cir. 2018) case opinion from the US Court of Appeals for the ...

www.boomerisablog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/315/2018/09/09-18-18-Jalali-v-Unum.pdf

Sep 18, 2018 ... Insurance Company (Unum) can apply an offset to the long-term disability benefits it pays .... Jalali v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am., No. 2:12-CV-00828, 2014 .... v. Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp., 305 F.3d 439, 449 (6th Cir.

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/526/358

Defendant-petitioner UNUM Life Insurance Company of America (UNUM) issued ... should be deemed to act as the insurance company's agent under Elfstrom v.

casetext.com/case/laprease-v-unum-life-ins-co-of-america

Russell v. Comcast Corp. …In sum, where there is relevant evidence in the ..... Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am., 217 F.3d 1145, 1150-53 (9th Cir. ... Armstrong v. Liberty ...

readingroom.law.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2419&context=gsulr

Unum Life. Ins. Co. of Am., 379 F.3d 997, 1006 (10th Cir. 2004)). 45. Id. (quoting Brown, 898 F.2d at 1566). 46. Beatty, supra note 12, at 746 (citing Armstrong v.

cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/08/26/13-17196.pdf

Aug 26, 2016 ... The panel held that Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (“MetLife”) ..... Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am., 444 F.3d 569, 575–76 ..... See Armstrong v.