United States v. Arnold, 533 F.3d 1003 (9th Cir. 2008), is a United States court case in which .... The Court distinguished searches at American airports because they are considered border searches, and occur at the "functional equivalent of a  ...


UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ... U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (“CBP”) Officer Laura Peng first saw Arnold while he was in line waiting to  ...


Case opinion for US 11th Circuit UNITED STATES v. ARNOLD. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw. ... UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.


United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co. No. 25. Argued April 20, 1967. Decided June 12, 1967. 388 U.S. 365. Syllabus. This is a civil antitrust suit under § 1 of the  ...


On April 21st, the Ninth Circuit held in United States v. Arnold that the Fourth Amendment does not require government agents to have reasonable suspicion ...


A summary and case brief of United States v. Arnold, including the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, key terms, and concurrences and dissents.


Arnold - The United States v. Arnold was a case involving a traveler who had his laptop seized and searched. Find out about the United States v. Arnold.


The United States brought an antitrust action against Arnold, Schwinn & Co. and its distributor Schwinn Cycle Distributors Association. Arnold only allowed ...


May 18, 2007 ... UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ... United States v. Arnold. Page 2 his Confrontation Clause rights by .... 1974); see also United States v.