The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was a United States federal law that, prior to being ruled ... Until Section 3 of the Act was struck down in 2013 (United States v. ... The New York Times said the question was "all but dormant" until the late ..... issued a brief defending the constitutionality of DOMA in the case of Smelt v.


ARTHUR SMELT and. CHRISTOPHER ... PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the defendant United States of America. 28 hereby .... UNITED STATES, ET AL. 2.


Case opinion for US 2nd Circuit UNITED STATES v. ... Abramowitz, et al., and Bryan C. Skarlatos, Kostelanetz & Fink, of counsel), for Respondent-Appellant.


148 F.2d 416 (1945). UNITED STATES v. ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA et al. No . 144. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. March 12, 1945. *417 *418 ...


US Federal Courts Reported Opinions, Decisions and Case Law from Justia. ... Roth Brothers Smelting Corp.; Roth Steel Corporation; S & J Generators & Starter .... Angela Figueroa-torres, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees,v.pedro Toledo-davila, et al. , .... Sr.; Arthur H. Bunte, Jr.; Harold D. Leu, Present Trustee, and Raymond Cash,  ...


Ballotpedia: The Encyclopedia of American Politics. ... United States of America, et al, CV 04-08425-VAP(EX)) ... Judge(s):David Carter (Arthur Smelt et al v.


David Carter is a federal judge for the United States District Court for the Central District of ... See also: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California ( Arthur Smelt et al v. United States of America et al, 8:09-cv-00286-DOC-MLG).


Oct 18, 2012 ... United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. .... Church of American Knights of the Ku Klux Klan v. .... May 24, 2012); Smelt v. ...... 16B Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, et al., Federal Practice & Procedure § 4014 (2d ...


281 U.S. 276. Patton v. United States (No. 53). Argued: February 25, 1930 ... P. 287 et seq. 2. .... The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury, and such trial shall be held in the State ..... by conditions which no longer exist, and, as the Supreme Court of Nevada well said in Reno Smelting Works v.