Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radovich_v._National_Football_League

Radovich v. National Football League (NFL), 352 U.S. 445 (1957) is a U.S. Supreme Court decision ruling that professional football, unlike professional baseball, was subject to antitrust laws. It was the third of three such cases heard by the Court in the 1950s involving the antitrust status of professional sports. Three justices ...

law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/323/124/150937

American Football League et al., Appellants, v. National Football League et al., Appellees, 323 F.2d 124 (4th Cir. ... On July 28, Bell, with Hunt's permission, told a congressional committee of Hunt's plans, and stated that the National League owners favored organization of the new league. Early in August, Hunt and Adams  ...

law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/205/60/2181427

AMERICAN FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al. v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al. ..... *67 At the January 1958 annual meeting of the NFL, Bell appointed an expansion committee, with Halas as chairman. Marshall, an opponent of expansion, insisted that the committee be a committee of the whole, but Bell directed that Halas ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/459/1074

U.S. Supreme Court. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE v. NORTH AMERICAN SOCCER LEAGUE , 459 U.S. 1074 (1982). 74 L.Ed.2d 639 459 U.S. 1074. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al. v. NORTH AMERICAN SOCCER LEAGUE et al. No. 81-2296. Supreme Court of the United States. December 6, 1982. On petition ...

www.txed.uscourts.gov/?q=national-football-league-players-association-national-football-league-et-al-case-417-cv-615

National Football League Players Association v. National Football League et al; Case: 4:17-cv-615. You are here. Home. Attachments. Memorandum Opinion and Order Dated 9-8-2017.pdf · Home · Contact Us · Employment · ECF · Forms · Links · Sitemap | BrowseAloud · Court Information · United States Court Sites ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/352/445

352 U.S. 445 (77 S.Ct. 390, 1 L.Ed.2d 456). William RADOVICH, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, Bert Bell, J. Rufus Klawans, et al. No. 94. Argued: Jan. 17, 1957. Decided: Feb. 25, 1957. opinion, CLARK [HTML]; dissent, FRANKFURTER [HTML]; dissent, HARLAN, BRENNAN [HTML]. See 353 U.S. 931, 77 ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1053070.html

Court of Appeal, Sixth District, California. OAKLAND RAIDERS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. H026688. Decided: July 28, 2005. Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk & Rabkin, Kenneth G. Hausman, Simon J. Frankel, Matthew R. Schultz, San ...

nflconcussionlitigation.com/?page_id=18

Consumer class action filed against Riddell Helmets & Easton-Bell Sports over purportedly false statements that “athletes who wore the Riddell Revolution helmet ... 1) Easterling v. NFL (Aug. 17) E.D. Penn [7 players] — First federal lawsuit and class action filed on August 17, 2011. 2) Dave Pear et al v. NFL (Oct. 11) CA ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/08-661.html

May 24, 2010 ... Case opinion for US Supreme Court AMERICAN NEEDLE, INC. v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE ET AL.. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.