Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_and_British_English_spelling_differences

Many of the differences between American and British English date back to a time when spelling standards .... Most words of this kind came from Latin, where the ending was spelled -or. .... In American English, almost all of these have become -er, but in British English only some of them have. ...... 2002) Merriam- Webster, Inc.

law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/west-virginia/wvsdce/2:2014cv01374/141862/146

Good et al v. American Water Works Company, Inc. et al, No. 2:2014cv01374 - Document 146 (S.D.W. Va. 2014) case opinion from the Southern District of West  ...

law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/michigan/miedce/5:2016cv11367/310106/23

Moeller et al v. American Media, Inc. et al, No. 5:2016cv11367 - Document 23 ( E.D. Mich. 2017) case opinion from the Eastern District of Michigan U.S. Federal  ...

scocal.stanford.edu/opinion/johnson-v-american-standard-33197

Apr 3, 2008 ... v. Ct.App. 2/5 B179206 AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., Los Angeles County ..... quoting Twerski et al., The Use and Abuse of Warnings in Products ..... On application of plaintiff and appellant and good cause appearing, it is ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/il-court-of-appeals/1238323.html

AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., American Water Works Service Company, Inc., Arkla .... (5) upon reasonable notice to all parties, as evidence at trial or hearing ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/539/194.html

United States Supreme Court. UNITED STATES et al. v. AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., (2003). No. 02-361. Argued: March 5, 2003 Decided:  ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/10-174.html

Jun 20, 2011 ... ... for US Supreme Court AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER CO., INC., ET AL. v. ... The Act directs EPA to establish emissions standards for categories of .... gas] emitting facilities" use the "best available control technology.

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/483/266

AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC., et al., Appellants, v. .... Chicago, Ill., for appellants. Suellen M. Wolfe, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellees. TOP .... Section 2102(b) facially fails the third prong of the Complete Auto standard which  ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/377/476

ARO MANUFACTURING CO., Inc., et al., Petitioners, v. ... Respondent Convertible Top Replacement Co., Inc., (CTR) acquired by assignment ..... American Patents Development Corp., 283 U.S. 27, 51 S.Ct. 334, 75 L.Ed. 819; Mercoid Corp. v. ...... that is too narrow a standard of what constitutes impermissible 'reconstruction.