Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller

District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held, in a 5–4 decision, that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doe_ex._rel._Tarlow_v._District_of_Columbia

Doe ex. rel. Tarlow v. District of Columbia, 489 F.3d 376 (D.C. Cir. 2007), is a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, written by Circuit Judge Brett Kavanaugh, in which the Court upheld a 2003 District of Columbia statute that stated the conditions for authorizing a non- emergency ...

www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/A9E3FACBA189549F85257E51004EDF52/$file/14-7086-1553953.pdf

United States Court of Appeals. FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Argued May 8, 2015. Decided May 26, 2015. No. 14-7086. LATONYA BOOSE,. APPELLANT v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,. APPELLEE. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. (No. 1:13-cv-00305). Douglas W.

www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/F0D1141CED49F03285257F7E00501AE2/$file/15-7002-1605050.pdf

Mar 22, 2016 ... Boose v. District of. Columbia, 786 F.3d 1054, 1056 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted). As we held in Reid ex rel. Reid v. District of Columbia, an award of compensatory education. “must be reasonably calculated to provide the educational benefits that likely would have accrued from special.

www.oyez.org/cases/1987/86-803

Nov 9, 1987 ... A provision in the District of Columbia Code prohibited the display of signs within 500 feet of a foreign embassy which tended to "bring that government into public odium or public disrepute." Congregations of three or more persons within the 500 feet limit were prohibited as well. Boos and others were ...

www.quimbee.com/cases/boos-v-barry

A District of Columbia law prohibited the display of any sign within five hundred feet of a foreign embassy if that sign tended to bring that foreign government into “public odium” or “public disrepute.” Boos and two other individuals (plaintiffs) wished to carry signs that criticized the governments of the Soviet Union and ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/485/312/case.html

U.S. Supreme Court. Boos v. Barry, 485 U.S. 312 (1988). Boos v. Barry. No. 86- 803. Argued November 9, 1987. Decided March 22, 1988. 485 U.S. 1988. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR. THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Syllabus. District of Columbia Code § 22- 1115 makes it ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZD1.html

Jun 26, 2008 ... DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., PETITIONERS v. DICK ANTHONY ... We must decide whether a District of Columbia law that prohibits the possession of handguns in the home violates the Second Amendment . ..... Randall v. Sorrell, 548 U. S. 230, 249 (2006) (opinion of Breyer, J.) (citing Bose Corp. v.

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/485/312

485 U.S. 312. Boos v. Barry (No. 86-803). Argued: November 9, 1987. Decided: March 22, 1988. 255 U.S.App.D.C.19, 798 F.2d 1450, affirmed in part and reversed in part. Syllabus; Opinion, O'Connor; Concurrence, Brennan; CDInPart, Rehnquist. Syllabus. District of Columbia Code § 22-1115 makes it unlawful, within 500 ...