law.justia.com/cases/ohio/fifth-district-court-of-appeals/2011/11cae050042.html

Burgess v. Johnson - 2011-Ohio-5241. ... Case Law › Ohio Case Law › Ohio Court of Appeals, Fifth District Decisions › 2011 › Burgess v. Johnson. Burgess v.

www.law360.com/cases/59c26f28b9a1b570bd000004

Parties, docket activity and news coverage of federal case PFIZER INC. v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al, case number 2:17-cv-04180, from Pennsylvania ...

www.law360.com/cases/5a7cc0e60857786cdc000002

Parties, docket activity and news coverage of federal case HALL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al, case number 3:18-cv-01833, from New Jersey Court.

www.reuters.com/article/us-johnson-johnson-verdict/jj-must-pay-72-million-for-cancer-death-linked-to-talcum-powder-lawyers-idUSKCN0VW20A

Feb 23, 2016 ... Johnson & Johnson was ordered by a Missouri state jury to pay $72 million of damages to the family of a woman ... The case is Hogans et al v.

www.reuters.com/article/us-johnson-johnson-cancer-lawsuit/johnson-johnson-wins-reversal-of-72-million-verdict-over-talc-cancer-risks-idUSKBN1CM2IF

Oct 17, 2017 ... Johnson & Johnson on Tuesday won the reversal of a $72 million verdict in favor of the family of ... The case is Estate of Jacqueline Fox et al v.

news.stlpublicradio.org/post/johnson-johnson-hit-469-billion-loss-baby-powder-ovarian-cancer-case

Jul 13, 2018 ... The legal assault on Johnson & Johnson and its signature baby powder reached new heights today, ... All contended that asbestos exposure from longtime use of Johnson's Baby Powder or ... The latest case, called Ingham v.

scocal.stanford.edu/opinion/burgess-v-superior-court-gupta-31436

Jul 9, 1992 ... (Cf. Cunningham et al., Williams Obstetrics, supra, at p. 1.) .... for emotional distress arising out of death of her child during birth]; Johnson v.