Web Results


Christiansen et al v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al, No. 1: 2013cv00297 - Document 192 (N.D. Ga. 2015) case opinion from the Northern District of Georgia US Federal District Court.


Fields v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc et al, No. 4:2015cv00110 - Document 47 (N.D. Ind. 2017) case opinion from the Northern District of Indiana US Federal District Court.


This litigation involves claims that certain hip replacement devices manufactured by Wright Medical Technology, Inc. were defectively designed and caused personal injury to plaintiffs. The specific devices at issue in this litigation include Wright's CONSERVE® Total Hip Implant System, CONSERVE® Total A-Class ...


Nov 19, 2015 ... Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Defendant, represented by Michael L Kirby, Kirby Noonan Lance and Hoge LLP, Ken E Steelman, Corbett Steelman and Specter APLC, Michael O Fawaz, Howard and Howard Attorneys PLLC, Michael V Kell, Howard and Howard Attorneys PLLC & Micaela P Banach, Kirby ...


Case Summary: 13-cv-02407 Case summary for this case are not yet available. Case Highlights Case highlights for this case are not yet available. Case-related documents, including those referenced above, are available via the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) service. For more information, visit  ...


Appeals Boar. A076558. Ducey v. Superior Court of Alameda County et al. A076559. Life Partners, Inc. et al. v. Quackenbush. A076578. Fossgreen v. Superior Court Contra Costa et al. A076588. Louie v. California Pacific Medical Center. A076589. Skiffer v. Skiffer. A076688. Commercial Discount Associates v. Blumenthal.