Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergio_Mart%C3%ADnez_vs._Darren_Barker

Sergio Martinez vs. Darren Barker was a Middleweight fight for The Ring title. The fight took place in Boardwalk Hall, Atlantic City, New Jersey, United States on 1 October 2011 Barker, the European champion, was certainly not the first choice for Martinez, various other potential opponents turned down overtures for a bout ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baker_v._Carr

Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case that decided that redistricting issues present justiciable questions, thus enabling federal courts to intervene in and to decide redistricting cases. The defendants unsuccessfully argued that redistricting of legislative districts is a " political ...

law.justia.com/cases/colorado/supreme-court/1989/88sa136-0.html

People v. Small, 631 P.2d at 154. The Barker balancing test for resolving the constitutional speedy trial issue requires consideration of all of the relevant facts. The sexual assault in this case allegedly occurred in an elementary school in Trinidad, Colorado. Paul Chavez was an elementary school teacher who was charged ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1673576.html

Jul 22, 2014 ... 376 applies only to theft-based offenses such as robbery, burglary, or receiving stolen property. (See People v. McFarland (1962) 58 Cal.2d 748, 755.) In People v. Barker (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 1166, this court held that it was error to include the crime of murder in the prior pattern jury instruction based on ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1607271.html

Jul 24, 2012 ... (Barker v. Lull Engineering Co. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 413, 429 (Barker ).) As we explained in McCabe v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2002) 100 Cal.App.4th 1111, 1120–1121 (McCabe ), “[T]he Supreme Court [has] recognized two tests for proving design defect. The 'consumer expectation test' permits a ...

nvcourts.gov/Supreme/Decisions/Court_of_Appeals/Unpublished_Orders

73811, BARKER (CURTIS) VS. THE EIGHTH JUD. DIST. CT. Nov 15, 2017. 73327, ENGEL (RUSSELL) VS. DIST. CT. (STATE), Nov 15, 2017. 73179, MONJE (DAVIS) VS. DIST. CT. (STATE), Nov 15, 2017. 73053, STATE VS. SELLERS (CYNDI), Nov 15, 2017. 73052, STATE VS. MOHAR (CELESTE), Nov 15, 2017.

apps.supremecourt.az.gov/aacc/1ca/1capartyindex.htm

S T U V W X Y Z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0. NOTE: The following is an alphabetical index of all persons and organizations that are parties in active cases. The FIND feature of your browser can be used to search this page. If you are sure you have an active case at this court and the party you are looking for does not appear on this  ...

www.scotusblog.com/2016/03/betterman-argument-analysis-what-prejudice-counts-and-what-is-the-remedy-for-an-inordinate-delay-in-sentencing

Mar 29, 2016 ... And second, even if the Due Process Clause provides the source, the appropriate mode of analysis may be the Sixth Amendment's four-factor Barker v. Wingo “test” for speedy trial violations. As Assistant to the Solicitor General Ginger Anders put it late in the fifty-seven-minute argument, “[w]hat we're ...

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/microsoft-corp-v-baker

Holding: Federal courts of appeals lack jurisdiction under 28 U. S. C. §1291 to review an order denying class certification (or, as in this case, an order striking class allegations) after the named plaintiffs have voluntarily dismissed their claims with prejudice. Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 8-0, in an opinion by Justice ...