Web Results
The Social Security Administration (SSA) is an independent agency of the United States federal government that administers Social Security, a social insurance program consisting of retirement, disability, and survivors' benefits.
Sponsored: Links provided by VigLink

law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/ohio/ohsdce

Docket Number: 1:2014cv00903. Norris v. Glassdoor, Inc. Date: July 13, 2018. Docket Number: 2:2017cv00791. Barnett v. Commissioner of Social Security

law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/oregon/ordce

Eustice v. Commissioner Social Security Administration Date: July 16, 2018 ... Barnett v. E: Space Labs LLC et al. Date: July 10, 2018. Docket Number: 6: ...

www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/rulings/ar/04/AR2000-01-ar-04.html

Jan 12, 2000 ... Albright v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration , 174 F.3d 473 (4th Cir. 1999) (Interpreting Lively v. Secretary of Health and ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-9th-circuit/1381629.html

Case opinion for US 9th Circuit ARMSTRONG v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/rulings/ar/06/AR98-04-ar-06.html

Jun 1, 1998 ... Drummond v. Commissioner of Social Security, 126 F.3d 837 (6th Cir. 1997) -- Effect of Prior Findings on Adjudication of a Subsequent ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-11th-circuit/1553609.html

Case opinion for US 11th Circuit WINSCHEL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-6th-circuit/1233721.html

Case opinion for US 6th Circuit DRUMMOND v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

www.crfb.org/sites/default/files/dubin.pdf

commissioner (SSA 2010a, 13), thus calling into question SSA's present policy direction on this issue. 1 See Pub. .... lower court has ruled, (Barnett v. Bowen ...

scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1807&context=hlr

1977); Barnett v. Mathews, No. 74-270 (D. Vt. Feb. 22, 1977) (delays in hearings for disability benefits under Supplemental Security Income); Blankenship v.