Web Results

www.law360.com/articles/662223/merck-prevails-in-former-exec-s-pregnancy-bias-suit

Jun 1, 2015 ... Colicchio's overall leave period of six months was part of a more general policy on the part of Merck. Colicchio is represented by Lisa Manshel of Franchis & Manshel LLC. Merck is represented by John K. Bennett of Jackson Lewis PC. The case is Colicchio v. Merck & Co. Inc. et al., case number ...

www.law360.com/articles/661456/ex-merck-director-s-pregnancy-bias-suit-heads-to-jury

May 29, 2015 ... Colicchio's overall leave period of six months was part of a more general policy on the part of Merck. Colicchio is represented by Lisa Manshel of Franchis & Manshel LLC. Merck is represented by John K. Bennett of Jackson Lewis PC. The case is Colicchio v. Merck & Co. Inc. et al., case number ...

www.law360.com/cases/5362954575127729f8000001

Parties, docket activity and news coverage of federal case Gilead Sciences, Inc. v . Merck & Co, Inc. et al, case number 5:13-cv-04057, from California Northern Court.

law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-jersey/njdce/2:2008cv03593/217059/103

COLICCHIO v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al, No. 2:2008cv03593 - Document 103 ( D.N.J. 2012) case opinion from the District of New Jersey US Federal District Court.

casetext.com/case/gilead-scis-inc-v-merck-co-7

Jun 6, 2016 ... “The record, however, reflects a pervasive pattern of misconduct by Merck and its agents constituting unclean hands, which renders Merck's '499 and '712 Patents unenforceable against Gilead.” Quoted 1 time; “However, Merck's argument glosses over the serious and outrageous conduct in this case in ...

www.ippractice.ca/litigation-statistics/intellectual-property-trials-jr-hearings-and-appeals

BAKER HUGHES CANADA COMPANY, Patent Infringement, 2017-02-06 for 18 d (Calgary) and 2017-03-07 for 3 d (Toronto), 2017 FC 1111 (O'Reilly). T-1728-15, PACKERS PLUS ENERGY SERVICES INC ET AL v WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL PLC ET AL, Patent Infringement, 2017-02-06 for 18 d (Calgary) and ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1324269.html

Mar 26, 2003 ... Case opinion for CA Court of Appeal FRIEDMAN v. MERCK CO. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw. ... Daniel FRIEDMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MERCK & CO., Inc. et al., Defendants and Respondents. ..... Revlon, Inc. (Iowa 1959) 251 Iowa 141, 100 N.W.2d 5, 7-9; Bennett v. Pilot Products Co.

www.abdataclassaction.com/cases

Vishva Desai and Philip J. Charvat, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated v. ADT Security Services, Inc. Advanta Corp. In re Advanta Corp. ERISA Litigation. Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. KBC Asset Management NV, et al. v. Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. Aéropostale, Inc. The City of Providence v.

www.sec.gov/litigation/amicusbriefs.shtml

Oct 24, 2017 ... Oct. 2009, Merck & Co., Inc., et al. v. Reynolds, et al: Amicus curiae brief filed in the Supreme Court by the Commission and the Solicitor General arguing that the limitations period for a private securities fraud claim under 28 U.S.C. 1658(b)(1) does not begin to run until the plaintiff has actually discovered, ...