Facts. Katskee (Plaintiff) was referred to another doctor by her gynecologist to have a consultation regarding Plaintiff"s family history of breast and ovarian cancer. Plaintiff did not have cancer at that time, but the doctor found her to be in an extremely high risk category. Plaintiff scheduled a hysterectomy and other procedures ...
Sep 8, 2017 ... Gary KING, as personal representative of Linda King, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF ILLINOIS; United Parcel Service of America, Inc.; UPS Health and Welfare Plan for Retired Employees; does, 1 through 10, Defendants–Appellees.
Case opinion for US 5th Circuit HUBBARD v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield Association, Defendant-Appellee.. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.
A summary and case brief of Katskee v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Nebraska, including the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, key terms, and concurrences and dissents.
See Virginia Academy of Clinical Psychologists v. Blue Shield of Virginia, 624 F. 2d 476, 478 (CA4 1980). She argues that Blue Shield's obligations must be read consistently with that statute, at least until that statute was held invalid as applied in Blue Cross of Virginia v. Commonwealth, 221 Va. 349, 269 S.E.2d 827 (1980).