Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Windsor

United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. 744 (2013) (Docket No. 12-307), is a landmark civil rights case in which the United States Supreme Court held that restricting U.S. federal interpretation of "marriage" and "spouse" to apply only to opposite-sex unions, by Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), is unconstitutional ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/337/49/case.html

That a person was a member of the armed forces at the time of the accident does not prevent recovery of a judgment against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act for his death or injury (not incident to his services in the armed forces) resulting from the negligence of an employee of the Government. Pp. 337  ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/267/432

267 U.S. 432 (45 S.Ct. 345, 69 L.Ed. 699). BROOKS v. UNITED STATES. No. 286 . Argued: Jan. 30, 1925. Decided: March 9, 1925. opinion, TAFT [HTML]. Mr. Joe Kirby, of Sioux Falls, S. D., for plaintiff in error. Argument of Counsel from pages 433-434 intentionally omitted. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Donovan, for the ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/337/49.html

Case opinion for US Supreme Court BROOKS v. UNITED STATES. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw. ... 4 What remained from previous bills was an exclusion of all claims for which compensation was provided by the World War Veterans' Act of 1924, 43 Stat. 607, 38 U.S.C.A. 421, et seq., 38 U.S.C.A. 421 et seq.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-federal-circuit/1701308.html

This case turns on the interpretation of the words “officially ordered or approved” in 38 U.S.C. § 7453(e)(1), the statute which provides overtime pay for nurses employed by the Department of Veterans Affairs. The statute does not require the official order or approval to be in any particular form, and the agency has not ...

www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a521076.pdf

United States Army, the Department of Defense, or any other governmental agency. ... Appendix A. The Veterans Affairs Claims Process A-l ..... in Brooks v. United States J$ In Brooks, a civilian Army employee, driving an Army truck while on duty, negligently struck two brothers, who were both active duty soldiers on ordinary ...

via.library.depaul.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1085&context=jhcl

for Health in the Department of Veterans Affairs sent an Information ..... 28 James M. Zouris, M.D. et al., Wounding Patterns for US Marines and Sailors ...... in Brooks v. United States, 337 U.S. 49. In United States v. Spelar,. 338 U.S. 217, we held that our courts did not have jurisdiction to try a tort action for injury by a federal ...

certpool.com/conferences/2018-02-16

Feb 16, 2018 ... Heidi E. Washington, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections, et al., No. ... United States, No. 17-6357, Yes, Redistributed, Distributed, Eleventh Circuit. Department of Homeland Security, et al. v. Regents of the University of California, et al., No. .... David J. Shulkin, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, No.

foiaproject.org/lawsuits-show-agency

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al. 1:2018cv00656, 03/22/18, AMERICAN OVERSIGHT v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al. 1: 2018cv00641, 03/20/18, DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. 1:2018cv00593, 03/16/18, SHAW v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ...