Web Results

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/349/294/case.html

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. Reargued on the question of relief April 11-14, 1955. Opinion and judgments announced May 31, 1955*. 349 U.S. 294 .... Together with No. 2, Briggs et al. v. Elliott et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of South Carolina; No. 3, Davis et al. v.

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/347/483/case.html

Belton et al., on certiorari to the Supreme Court of Delaware, argued December 11, 1952, reargued December 9, 1953. [Footnote 1]. In the Kansas case, Brown v. Board of Education, the plaintiffs are Negro children of elementary school age residing in Topeka. They brought this action in the United States District Court for  ...

openjurist.org/401/f3d/1233/mcclain-v-metabolife-international-inc

Mar 2, 2005 ... 401 F.3d 1233. Johnny C. McCLAIN, Annie McClain, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Shirley Franks, wife, Wilmer Hudson, husband, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross- Appellants, v. METABOLIFE INTERNATIONAL, INC., a corporation, Defendant- Appellant, Cross-Appellee. No. 03-12776. United States Court of Appeals ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1665043.html

Apr 30, 2014 ... KENSINGTON POLICE PROTECTION & COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT BOARD et al., Respondents and Appellants. .... (Martinez v. Metabolife Internat., Inc. (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 181, 188; see also Cotati, supra, 29 Cal.4th at p. 79.) As noted above, the trial court relied solely on San Ramon, supra, ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/349/294

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (). Argued: Reargued on the question of relief April 11-14, 1955. Decided: Opinion and judgments announced May 31, 1955 .... Together with No. 2, Briggs et al. v. Elliott et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of South Carolina; No. 3, Davis et al. v.

www.casp.net/california-anti-slapp-first-amendment-law-resources/caselaw/california-courts-of-appeal-cases

Rptr.3d 546): A.F. Brown Electrical Contractor, Inc. v. Rhino Electric Supply .... App.4th 322, 9 Cal.Rptr.3d 197): Plaintiffs sued Planned Parenthood under California's Unfair Competition Law (Business & Professions Code § 17200 et seq.) .... Metabolife International, Inc., 4th District Court of Appeal (2003); Scott v. Metabolife ...

www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-mad-1_15-md-02657/pdf/USCOURTS-mad-1_15-md-02657-1.pdf

May 4, 2016 ... KIERRA SIMMONS, et al., v. ) GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, .... Metabolife Int'l, Inc., 92 F. Supp. 2d 891, 899 (N.D. Iowa 2000)). ... Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011) ( citing International Shoe Co. v. State of Wash., Office of Unemployment Comp. & Placement, 326 U.S. 310 (1945)). The parties do not dispute that ...

www.keeganbaker.com/results

(18) Jean Hargis, et al. v. Metabolife International, Inc., Case No. GIC797521, California Superior Court, San Diego County, (Judge John S. Meyer) (settlement of an uncapped monetary recovery on behalf of the class of every purchaser of Metabolife's ephedrine products over 4 year period and prohibitive injunctive relief in ...

www.flnd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/Navelski%20-%20Order%20on%20Class%20Certification%2C%20Daubert%2C%20and%20Summary%20Judgment%2C%20ECF%20No.%2093.pdf

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. PENSACOLA DIVISION. JOHN NAVELSKI, et al.,. Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 3:14cv445/MCR/CJK. INTERNATIONAL PAPER .... McDowell v. Brown, 392 F.3d. 1283, 1298-99 (11th Cir. 2004). Expert testimony does not “fit” when there is “too great an analytical gap” between the facts and the  ...