Welcome to the informational website for the Settlement reached in Hatamian v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Court-appointed Class Counsel on behalf of themselves and the Settlement Class (defined below), have reached a proposed settlement of the Action for a total recovery of $29.5 million USD (the “Settlement” ) that, ...
T1691 v.09 11.01.2017. 1. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. OAKLAND DIVISION. Hatamian, et al. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al. Case No. 4:14-cv-00226-YGR. CLASS ACTION. NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. AND MOTION FOR ...
Jan 16, 2018 ... Counsel information for AMD was not available Tuesday. The case is Doyun Kim v. Advanced Micro Devices Inc. et al., case number 3:18-cv-00321, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. --Editing by Orlando Lorenzo. Update: This story has been updated with a statement from AMD.
Respondent Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD), filed an antitrust complaint against petitioner Intel Corporation (Intel) with the Directorate-General for Competition ... After the DG-Competition declined AMD's recommendation to seek documents Intel had produced in a private antitrust suit in an Alabama federal court, AMD ...
INTEL CORPORATION, PETITIONER v. ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. [June 21, 2004]. Justice Breyer, dissenting. The Court reads the scope of 28 U. S. C. §1782 to extend beyond what I believe Congress might reasonably have intended.