Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitol_Records,_Inc._v._Naxos_of_America,_Inc.

Capitol Records v. Naxos of America , 4 NY 3d 540 (NY April 5, 2005). is one of " the most notable case[s]" concerning the copyright status of US-published sound recordings issued before February 15, 1972 In this case, the New York Court of Appeals held that pre-1972 sound recordings, which are not given copyright ...

law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca8/11-2820/11-2820-2012-09-11.html

This appeal arose from a dispute between several recording companies and defendant. Defendant willfully infringed copyrights of 24 sound recordings by engaging in file-sharing on the Internet. On appeal, the companies appealed the remedy ordered by the district court. The court concluded that the recording companies ...

h2o.law.harvard.edu/collages/14049

Aug 4, 2014 ... The Court can draw from the Complaint and the current record a reasonable inference in the plaintiffs' favor — that where the defendant has completed all the necessary steps for a public distribution, a reasonable fact-finder may infer that the distribution actually took place. [...]As in Hotaling, the defendants ...

www.leagle.com/decision/1988187137ad2d501180

May 17, 1988 ... Apple Records, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. ... through their New York corporation, Apple Records, Inc. (Apple), the Beatles entered into a significantly different relationship with defendants EMI and Capitol Records, ... Capitol Records disputes plaintiffs' characterization of the nature and effect of this agreement.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-2nd-circuit/1520421.html

Apr 29, 2010 ... Records Inc., a Delaware corporation; and Zomba Recording LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ... Defendant “Doe 3,” whose identity is not known to plaintiffs Arista Records LLC et al., appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New ...

digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1334&context=historical

Mar 30, 2013 ... RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge: Capitol Records, LLC (“Capitol”), the recording label for such classic vinyls as. Frank Sinatra's “Come Fly With Me” and . The Beatles' “Yellow Submarine,” brings this action against ReDigi Inc. (“ReDigi ”), a twenty-first century technology company that touts itself as a ...

www.aclu.org/legal-document/brief-respondents-santa-fe-schoold-district-v-doe

Santa Fe Independent School District,. Petitioner,. v. Jane Doe, et al.,. Respondents. ... Bowen v. Kendrick, 487 U.S. 589 (1988) Capitol Square Review and. Advisory Bd. v. Pinette, 515 U.S. 753 (1995) Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, .... The record in this case closed before the 1996 football season.

www.nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_live

Users seeking more details will be required to login to the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system at pacer.gov for access to the complete ... [ Counter Statement to Rule 56.1] (153). Sat, 17 Feb 2018 04:25:03 GMT. Related Companies L.P. et al v. Ruthling et al. 1:17-cv-04175. [Memorandum of Law in ...

www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-15_d1oe.pdf

Mar 31, 2015 ... ARMSTRONG v. EXCEPTIONAL CHILD CENTER, INC. Syllabus a private right of action. Article I vests Congress with broad discre- tion over the manner of implementing its enumerated powers. ... RICHARD ARMSTRONG, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. .... preratification historical record, which contained ample.