Web Results
(69)
945 W Huron St
(312) 492-6588
(3)
1655 S Blue Island Ave Chicago, IL
(312) 294-0040
(18)
5416 N Kedzie Ave
(773) 271-5100
(4)
549 W 31st St Chicago, IL
(312) 508-3495
Source:

www.law360.com/articles/629792/dc-circ-told-1-75m-malpractice-verdict-should-be-covered

Mar 10, 2015 ... Medical malpractice law firm Paulson & Nace PLLC told the D.C. Circuit on Tuesday that Chicago Insurance Co. should cover the $1.75 million legal malpractice verdict against the ... Paulson & Nace PLLC et al., the case number is 14-7063, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

carrmaloney.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/The-Consequences-of-Failing-to-Disclose-a-Potential-Claim-to-your-Insurer.pdf

Apr 21, 2015 ... By: William J. Carter, Esq. and Katherine C. Ondeck, Esq. The D.C. Circuit recently held in Chicago Insurance Co. v. Paulson & Nace, PLLC et al. that. Chicago Insurance Company was justified in denying a $1.75 million legal malpractice award because the policyholder had failed to inform it of the potential  ...

www.swartzcampbell.com/making-the-nightmare-worse

Sep 9, 2014 ... In Chicago Insurance Company v. Paulson & Nace, PLLC, et al., No. 12-2068 ( D.D.C. April 10, 2014), summary judgment was granted in favor of a professional liability insurance company in a declaratory judgment action. The declaratory judgment action was brought after the attorneys were sued for legal ...

www.paulsonandnace.com/why-paulson-and-nace

Barry Nace has taken the fight for his clients' rights all the way to the Supreme Court of the United States in perhaps the most important case on expert testimony, Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals. Perhaps most importantly, Mr. Nace has been so committed to his clients and their plights throughout his career that all ...

www.paulsonandnace.com/our-team/barry-j-nace

One of his cases, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., in which the Supreme Court eased the standard for the admissibility of expert testimony, has generated more than 100 articles, newsletters, and websites devoted to an ongoing discussion of this landmark decision. Mr. Nace has been repeatedly recognized as ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-dc-circuit/1716470.html

Oct 23, 2015 ... We review questions involving contract interpretation and choice-of-law de novo. Essex Ins. Co. v. Doe ex rel. Doe, 511 F .3d 198, 200 (D.C.Cir.2008); Chicago Ins . Co. v. Paulson & Nace, PLLC, 783 F.3d 897, 901 (D.C.Cir.2015). Because both of appellants' arguments lack merit, we affirm the district court.

www.uscourts.gov/file/13727/download

Nov 5, 2014 ... Briefs. Environmental Matters. DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE et al v. SALAZAR et al . MOTION for Summary Judgment <i></i>. B. Opinion/Decision in Draft. Insurance . CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY v. PAULSON & NACE, PLLC, ET A. MOTION for Summary Judgment <i></i>. B. Opinion/Decision in Draft.

www.goldbergsegalla.com/sites/default/files/CaseWatch-Insurance-Vol.17-No.5-i.pdf

May 13, 2015 ... Adolfo Vela v. Catlin Specialty. Insurance Company, et al. (Tex. App., April 16, 2015). A Texas appeals court upheld the trial court ruling that the ..... Chicago Ins. Co. v. Paulson & Nace, PLLC. (D.C. Cir., April 21, 2015). The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C.. Circuit affirmed a summary judgment ruling.

www.joneslemongraham.com/blog/category/professional-liability-insurance

Nov 3, 2017 ... The prior knowledge decision: In Chicago Insurance Co. v. Paulson & Nace, PLLC, et al, Case No. 12-2068 (ABJ) (D. D.C. April 10, 2014), a case generally along these lines, a court granted a summary judgment for the insurer on a prior knowledge defense and against the lawyers and Minor Child.