Did you mean: CONNOR v. WYETH et al ?
Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_New_London

Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005) was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private owner to another private owner to further economic development. In a 5–4 decision, the Court held that the general benefits a community ...

www.americanbar.org/newsletter/publications/aba_health_esource_home/aba_health_law_esource_1104_brown.html

Bruesewitz v. Wyeth's Impact on the Vaccine Safety Debate. By Erin C. Fuse Brown1 & Jalayne J. Arias2, Public Health Law and Policy Program at Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law at Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ. Author Childhood vaccines are extolled for effective prevention of dangerous diseases. However ...

www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/02271707en.pdf

Feb 27, 2017 ... ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES. Phillip E. Stephenson. Michael T. Hotz. Spitzer Herriman Stephenson. Holderead Conner & Persinger,. LLP. Marion, Indiana. IN THE. COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA. M Doed, LLC,. Appellant-Petitioner, v. Wyeth S. Barrington, Pamela L. Barrington, City of Marion, Ed.

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/562/223/opinion.html

RUSSELL BRUESEWITZ, et al., PETITIONERS v. WYETH LLC, fka WYETH, INC., fka WYETH LABORATORIES, et al. on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the third circuit. [February 22, 2011]. Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court. We consider whether a preemption provision enacted in the  ...

www.faegrebd.com/supreme-court-decides-bruesewitz-v-wyeth-llc

Feb 22, 2011 ... On February 22, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC , No. 09-152, holding that the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 preempts all design-defect claims against vaccine manufacturers in which the plaintiff seeks compensation for injury or death caused by a vaccine's ...

law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/3d/222/379.html

[No. D009850. Fourth Dist., Div. One. July 26, 1990.] JARIDIJON SALASGUEVARA, a Minor, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WYETH LABORATORIES, INC. et al., Defendants and Respondents. [Opinion certified for partial publication.fn. * ]. (Superior Court of San Diego County, No. 514814, Mack P. Lovett, Judge.) (Opinion ...

www.chegg.com/homework-help/bruesewitz-v-wyeth-llc-compan-y-profile-wyeth-llc-subsidiary-chapter-13-problem-1c-solution-9781285428949-exc

In Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, LLC, 562 U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct. 1068, 179 L.Ed.2d 1 (2011), the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the lower court's judgment in favor of Wyeth, LLC because an agency was created to compensate successful claimants from a fund created by manufacturers of vaccines that are in compliance with all ...

www.law360.com/articles/759266/pfizer-to-pay-785m-to-settle-fca-claims-over-protonix

Feb 16, 2016 ... Counsel information for LaCorte was not immediately available. Wyeth is represented by Brien T. O'Connor, John P. Bueker, Douglas Hallward-Driemeier and Harvey J. Wolkoff of Ropes & Gray LLP. The case is U.S. et al. v. Wyeth, case numbers 1:06-cv-11724 and 1:03-cv-12366, in the U.S. District Court ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/555/555.html

It is a central premise of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) and the FDA's regulations that the manufacturer bears responsibility for the content of its label at all times. Pp. 11-16. (b) Wyeth's argument that requiring it to comply with a state- law duty to provide a stronger warning would interfere with Congress' purpose ...