Web Results


May 26, 2011 ... Richard E. Winnie, County Counsel, Jannie L. Wong, Deputy County Counsel, for Appellants County of Alameda, et. al. Judith Z. Gold, Stephen Ronfeldt, The PublicInterest Law Project, Oakland; Grace A. Carter, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP, San Francisco; Steven Weiss, Bay Area Legal Aid, ...


[Civ. No. 48112. Court of Appeals of California, First Appellate District, Division Three. September 18, 1980.] CHURCH OF HAKEEM, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, Respondent; JAMES K. CARTER et al., Real Parties in Interest. (Opinion by Scott, J., with White, P. J., and  ...


Docket Number: 5:2016cv07143. In Re SunPower Corporation Shareholder Derivative Litigation Date: December 27, 2016. Docket Number: 5:2016cv05312. McKay et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al. Date: December 23, 2016. Docket Number: 5:2016cv03561. George M Avila v. Wells Fargo Bank, N. A. et al


Cancel v. Volunteers of America, et al., Alameda Superior Court, Case No. 778270-7. Settlement on behalf of employee in employment discrimination suit. Carter v. Santa Clara County, et al., United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Case No. C 94-20829 RMW. $1.2M verdict on First Amendment ...


4 consisting of all current and future applicants for regular and expedited CalFresh (Food. 5 Stamp) benefits ... to thousands oflow-. 11 income households in Alameda County critically in need of this assistance to help them ..... 11 Handbook Section 63-03.02 states, "The 3-day timefi·ame shall begin the day the ET [Eligibility.


Agnew v. State Board of Equalization, 21 Cal.4th 310 . . . Const XIII § 32. Agua Caliente Band of Mission Indians v. Riverside County, 442 F.2d 1184, cert. den. 405 U.S. ... Alameda County; Schnitzer Steel Products of California, Inc. v., 56 Cal .App.3d .... 1, et al.; Joseph E. Holland, Assessor (Santa Barbara County) v., 58 Cal.


Jan 8, 2018 ... Respondents are the County of Alameda, Califor- nia; the Alameda County Board of Supervisors, as a policy making body; Wilma Chan, in her official capac- ity; Nate Miley, in his official capacity; and Keith Car- son, in his official capacity. All respondents were defendants and appellees below.


SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY et al., Respondents; HAROLD R. SHERWOOD, Real Party in Interest. ... (Lundberg v. County of Alameda, 46 Cal.2d 644, 652 [298 P.2d 1].) Section 170.6 was passed by an overwhelming vote of both houses of the Legislature and approved by the Governor in 1957.


Longshore v. County of Ventura , 25 Cal.3d 14. [L.A. No. 31090. Supreme Court of California. August 22, 1979.] WOODROW G. LONGSHORE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF VENTURA et al., Defendants and Respondents. ( Opinion by Richardson, J., expressing the unanimous view of the court.) [25 Cal. 3d ...