Web Results

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-9th-circuit/1277382.html

Silvestre Chavez appeals the judgment affirming the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying his claim for disability benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-422 and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1383d. The district court had subject matter jurisdiction under 42 ...

www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/rulings/ar/09/AR97-04-ar-09.html

Dec 3, 1997 ... AR 97-4(9): Chavez v. Bowen, 844 F.2d 691 (9th Cir. 1988) -- Effect of a Prior Final Decision That a Claimant is Not Disabled, And of Findings Contained Therein, On Adjudication of a Subsequent Disability Claim Arising Under the Same Title of the Social Security Act -- Titles II and XVI of the Social Security ...

www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/hallex/I-05/I-5-4-60.html

This Temporary Instruction provides, in question and answer format, guidance for implementing Social Security Acquiescence Ruling (AR) 97-4(9), Chavez v. ... On March 30, 1983 an Administrative Law Judge(ALJ) issued a decision awarding a claimant a closed period of disability from March 3, 1981 through May 1982.

secure.ssa.gov/poms.nsf/lnx/0452755010

Jan 11, 2017 ... DI 52755.010 How the Chavez AR Applies. A. Policy. 1. General. AR 97-4(9) requires adjudicators to apply the principles described in DI 52755.010A.2 through DI 52755.010A.4 below when: The adjudicator is deciding a subsequent disability claim with an unadjudicated period; and. The subsequent claim ...

secure.ssa.gov/poms.nsf/lnx/0452755001

DI 52755.001 General Information on the Chavez Acquiescence Ruling (AR). A. Introduction. This subchapter provides case processing instructions that you must apply when implementing AR 97-4(9) acquiescing in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in Chavez v. Bowen.

www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/rulings/rulfind4.html

Albright v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration , ((Interpreting Lively v. Secretary of Health and Human Services )—Effect of Prior Disability Findings ... Chavez v. Bowen , (effect of a prior final decision that a claimant is not disabled, and of findings contained therein, on adjudication of a subsequent disability ...

www.law.cornell.edu/socsec/course/readings/844_f2d_691.htm

On June 1, 1982, Chavez first filed for Social Security disability insurance benefits. On March 30, 1983, Administrative Law Judge Duty awarded Chavez a closed period of disability from March 3, 1981 through May 1982, based upon disability continuing through March 1982. Judge Duty found that Chavez then was unable ...

www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-mied-2_09-cv-12336/pdf/USCOURTS-mied-2_09-cv-12336-4.pdf

Mar 14, 2011 ... 1. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. SOUTHERN DIVISION. Amy Chavez,. Plaintiff,. Case No. 09-12336 v. Hon. Sean F. Cox. Waterford ... insurance carriers, social security administration, or authors of any determinations on her witness list. Defendant first asserts ...

social-security-law.wikispaces.com/2socsecE800

... (AR 97-4) implements the Ninth Circuit's ruling in Chavez v. Bowen, 844 F.2d 691 (9th Cir. 1988). Chavez held that in making a disability determination on a subsequent disability claim under the same title of the Social Security Act (the Act ) as a prior claim on which there had been a final decision by an Administrative Law ...