Web Results
Go To:: Michaels Stores
Michaels is the largest arts and crafts retail chain in the world. It currently operates more than 1040 Michaels Arts and Crafts Stores located in 49 U.S. states and in Canada...
Sponsored: Links provided by VigLink

www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4387941/whalen-v-michaels-stores

May 2, 2017 ... 12 13 MARY JANE WHALEN, 14 Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, 15 16 v. Nos . 16-260 (L) 17 16-352 (XAP) 18 MICHAELS STORES, INC., 19 Defendant- Appellee-Cross-Appellant.** 20 ...

masscases.com/cases/sjc/464/464mass492.html

Nov 6, 2012 ... BOTSFORD, J . In 2011, Melissa Tyler, a customer of Michaels Stores, Inc. ( Michaels), filed an action on behalf of herself and a putative class of Michaels customers in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Tyler's complaint alleged that Michaels unlawfully writes customers' ...

casetext.com/case/whalen-v-michaels-stores-inc

May 2, 2017 ... FOR THE COURT: Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court. SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-11th-circuit/1864633.html

Jun 15, 2017 ... Timothy Juback sued his former employer, Michaels Stores, Inc., claiming that Michaels terminated him because he filed a workers' compensation claim. Mr. Juback asserted claims under the Florida Workers' Compensation Law, Fla. Stat. § 440.01, et seq., the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. ...

www.crowell.com/files/20170403-US-v-Michaels-Stores-Unopposed-Motion.pdf

Apr 3, 2017 ... Three Legged Monkey, LP et al. v. City of El Paso, Texas, et al., No. EP-14-CV- 00260-FM, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 194502, *9 (W.D.. Tex. Nov. 3, 2014). Rule 15( a)(2) provides that a party may amend its pleading before trial only with written consent of the opposing party or leave of court, and specifies that ...

www.masstortdefense.com/articles/consumer-products

Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint asserted claims for violations of the Washington Consumer Protection Act (“CPA”), RCW 19.86.010 et seq.; misrepresentation; and negligence. Plaintiff specifically alleged that the VitaRain beverage (1) lacked a front-facing disclosure that the beverage contains caffeine; (2) failed to ...